Major data gaps and recommendations in monitoring regulations of activities in EU marine protected areas

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) play a central role in maritime policies, but there are no comprehensive analyses of regulations in EU MPAs. Using publicly available data on EU MPAs’ regulations for nine activities, we first show that MPA and MSP databases display significant gaps in data comprehensiveness. The regulation of each activity was known in 40% or less of the MPA area (whether allowed, prohibited, or restricted), except for fishing activities (70% of MPA area), albeit with limited detail. Fishing, mining, or dredging/dumping activities were allowed in half of MPA area. Only mining was reported as prohibited in at least 10% of the MPA area. We discuss gaps in MPA regulatory data in light of existing reporting requirements, insufficient connection between various actors and data sources, and challenges in translating legal information into actionable indicators. We provide recommendations for future initiatives to improve the collection and standardization for environmental policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Ocean Sustainability
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-025-00104-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Major data gaps and recommendations in monitoring regulations of activities in EU marine protected areas

Bárbara Horta e Costa, Jennifer Sletten, Joachim Claudet, Natașa Văidianu et al.
5 citations
npj Ocean Sustainability
Coastal and Marine Management
12.11
article

Major data gaps and recommendations in monitoring regulations of activities in EU marine protected areas

Bárbara Horta e Costa, Jennifer Sletten, Joachim Claudet, Natașa Văidianu, Margherita Pieraccini, Betty Quéffelec, Juliette Young, Juliette Aminian-Biquet, Anastasiya Laznya, Timothé Vincent
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) play a central role in maritime policies, but there are no comprehensive analyses of regulations in EU MPAs. Using publicly available data on EU MPAs’ regulations for nine activities, we first show that MPA and MSP databases display significant gaps in data comprehensiveness. The regulation of each activity was known in 40% or less of the MPA area (whether allowed, prohibited, or restricted), except for fishing activities (70% of MPA area), albeit with limited detail. Fishing, mining, or dredging/dumping activities were allowed in half of MPA area. Only mining was reported as prohibited in at least 10% of the MPA area. We discuss gaps in MPA regulatory data in light of existing reporting requirements, insufficient connection between various actors and data sources, and challenges in translating legal information into actionable indicators. We provide recommendations for future initiatives to improve the collection and standardization for environmental policies.

npj Ocean SustainabilityVol. 4(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), University of Bucharest (RO), Ifremer (FR), Ovidius University (RO), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Stockholm University (SE), Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR), Université de Bourgogne (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Medical Protective (US), University of Bristol (GB), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Agroécologie (FR), Institut Agro Dijon (FR), Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (FR), University of Algarve (PT)
Biodiversa+, European Commission, Fondation de France, Centro de Ciências do Mar, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Coastal and Marine Management
12.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.