The Ebbinghaus illusion revisited: Behavioral shift in task-solving between 4-year-olds, 6-year-olds, and adolescents

Visual context influences humans’ interpretation of stimuli. The Ebbinghaus illusion demonstrates how physical context cues can lead to distorted perceptions. Prior studies on young children’s context-sensitivity leave it open whether older age groups are indeed more susceptible to visual illusions than younger ones or whether young children use different mechanisms when solving this task. This study addresses these questions by investigating 4-year-olds’ ( n = 41), 6-year-olds’ ( n = 46), and adolescents’ ( n = 66) performance in an Ebbinghaus illusion task. We especially focused on 4-year-olds’ performance, including a novel control condition, to help disentangle the non-expected findings from previous studies. The results replicated previous findings of a developmental increase in context-sensitivity in the Ebbinghaus task. However, there was a behavioral shift in task-solving between 4- and 6-year-olds. While younger children appeared to rely on a heuristic, evaluating the whole area covered by the target and the context cues, 6-year-olds and adolescents were influenced by the illusion. These findings suggest that novel paradigms are needed to test 4-year-olds’ sensitivity to physical context cues. • We investigated if young children are susceptible to the illusion or use a heuristic. • Results showed increased context-sensitivity (illusion susceptibility) with age. • A behavioral shift in task-solving was observed between 4- and 6-year-olds. • Four-year-olds used a heuristic based on the overall area of target and context circles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Development
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2025.101555
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ebbinghaus illusion revisited: Behavioral shift in task-solving between 4-year-olds, 6-year-olds, and adolescents

Cornelia Schulze, David Buttelmann
Cognitive Development
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

The Ebbinghaus illusion revisited: Behavioral shift in task-solving between 4-year-olds, 6-year-olds, and adolescents

Cornelia Schulze, David Buttelmann
article en

Abstract

Visual context influences humans’ interpretation of stimuli. The Ebbinghaus illusion demonstrates how physical context cues can lead to distorted perceptions. Prior studies on young children’s context-sensitivity leave it open whether older age groups are indeed more susceptible to visual illusions than younger ones or whether young children use different mechanisms when solving this task. This study addresses these questions by investigating 4-year-olds’ ( n = 41), 6-year-olds’ ( n = 46), and adolescents’ ( n = 66) performance in an Ebbinghaus illusion task. We especially focused on 4-year-olds’ performance, including a novel control condition, to help disentangle the non-expected findings from previous studies. The results replicated previous findings of a developmental increase in context-sensitivity in the Ebbinghaus task. However, there was a behavioral shift in task-solving between 4- and 6-year-olds. While younger children appeared to rely on a heuristic, evaluating the whole area covered by the target and the context cues, 6-year-olds and adolescents were influenced by the illusion. These findings suggest that novel paradigms are needed to test 4-year-olds’ sensitivity to physical context cues. • We investigated if young children are susceptible to the illusion or use a heuristic. • Results showed increased context-sensitivity (illusion susceptibility) with age. • A behavioral shift in task-solving was observed between 4- and 6-year-olds. • Four-year-olds used a heuristic based on the overall area of target and context circles.

Cognitive DevelopmentVol. 74
University of Bern (CH), Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.