Different properties of successful and error saccades in marmosets

Various oculomotor tasks have been used to study eye movements, cognitive control, attention, and neurological disorders. Typically, analysis focuses on successful trials, where the saccade lands very close to the intended target, in both humans or non-human primates (NHPs). Error trials, in which the saccade fails to land on the intended target, are often excluded from these analyses. In this study, we hypothesized that saccades contain information that can predict whether they will result in success or not. We collected data from common marmosets performing the gap saccade task and the oculomotor delayed response task. Successful saccades in both tasks were characterized by higher peak velocities, shorter durations, and shorter latencies compared to errant saccades, regardless of whether the amplitudes were matched or not. These results were further validated using a generalized linear model, with saccade velocity, duration, and latency as predictors. The model demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing between behavioural outcomes. Our findings suggest that the likelihood of a saccadic eye movement leading to a successful outcome may be predetermined, potentially reflecting the interaction between cognitive processes and saccade programming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroscience Research
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2025.02.001
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different properties of successful and error saccades in marmosets

Wajd Amly, Tadashi Isa, Hirotaka Onoe, Chih-Yang Chen
Neuroscience Research
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Different properties of successful and error saccades in marmosets

Wajd Amly, Tadashi Isa, Hirotaka Onoe, Chih-Yang Chen
article en

Abstract

Various oculomotor tasks have been used to study eye movements, cognitive control, attention, and neurological disorders. Typically, analysis focuses on successful trials, where the saccade lands very close to the intended target, in both humans or non-human primates (NHPs). Error trials, in which the saccade fails to land on the intended target, are often excluded from these analyses. In this study, we hypothesized that saccades contain information that can predict whether they will result in success or not. We collected data from common marmosets performing the gap saccade task and the oculomotor delayed response task. Successful saccades in both tasks were characterized by higher peak velocities, shorter durations, and shorter latencies compared to errant saccades, regardless of whether the amplitudes were matched or not. These results were further validated using a generalized linear model, with saccade velocity, duration, and latency as predictors. The model demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing between behavioural outcomes. Our findings suggest that the likelihood of a saccadic eye movement leading to a successful outcome may be predetermined, potentially reflecting the interaction between cognitive processes and saccade programming.

Neuroscience ResearchVol. 213
Kyoto University (JP), Kobe Gakuin University (JP)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.