Machine learning assisted axial strength prediction models for concrete filled stainless steel tubular columns

Concrete filled stainless steel tubular (CFSST) columns have gained popularity over conventional concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) columns owing to their higher axial capacity and excellent corrosion resistance of stainless steel (SS). Numerous experimental and numerical research have been performed to evaluate CFSST column response under different loading scenarios. Despite all these studies, inaccuracy still exists in predicting the axial strength of CFSST columns. Moreover, unique properties of SS do not allow using conventional code equations developed for CFST columns to be used for axial strength prediction of CFSST columns. To this end, this study aims to develop data-driven machine learning (ML) techniques for predicting the axial capacity of CFSST columns. A comprehensive dataset of 422 circular and rectangular CFSST columns are carefully gathered from literature, which is employed for developing the data-driven ML models. Model accuracy is assessed using various performance metrics such as coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error ( RMSE ), mean absolute error ( MAE) , Nash-Sutcliffe Model (NSE ) and Index of Agreement ( d ). Out of the ten ML algorithms considered in this study, CatBoost (CatB) turns out to be the most accurate one. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis is performed to interpret the outcomes of the ML model and explain the importance of each input feature. The best performing CatB model is compared with six different design code equations to showcase its acceptance and superior performance. It is observed that the ML model provides a quick and accurate estimate of the axial capacity of CFSST columns by overcoming the limitations of existing design codes. For identifying the resistance factor for the CatB model, reliability analysis is also performed following AISC 360–16 provision. Finally, an interactive graphical user interface is developed for practicing engineers to enhance the accuracy of CFSST axial capacity prediction while promoting the use of interpretable ML models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structures
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108329
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning assisted axial strength prediction models for concrete filled stainless steel tubular columns

Diptoshi Roy, Kamrul Islam, A. H. M. Muntasir Billah, Debarshi Das
6 citations
Structures
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
5.72
article

Machine learning assisted axial strength prediction models for concrete filled stainless steel tubular columns

Diptoshi Roy, Kamrul Islam, A. H. M. Muntasir Billah, Debarshi Das
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Concrete filled stainless steel tubular (CFSST) columns have gained popularity over conventional concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) columns owing to their higher axial capacity and excellent corrosion resistance of stainless steel (SS). Numerous experimental and numerical research have been performed to evaluate CFSST column response under different loading scenarios. Despite all these studies, inaccuracy still exists in predicting the axial strength of CFSST columns. Moreover, unique properties of SS do not allow using conventional code equations developed for CFST columns to be used for axial strength prediction of CFSST columns. To this end, this study aims to develop data-driven machine learning (ML) techniques for predicting the axial capacity of CFSST columns. A comprehensive dataset of 422 circular and rectangular CFSST columns are carefully gathered from literature, which is employed for developing the data-driven ML models. Model accuracy is assessed using various performance metrics such as coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error ( RMSE ), mean absolute error ( MAE) , Nash-Sutcliffe Model (NSE ) and Index of Agreement ( d ). Out of the ten ML algorithms considered in this study, CatBoost (CatB) turns out to be the most accurate one. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis is performed to interpret the outcomes of the ML model and explain the importance of each input feature. The best performing CatB model is compared with six different design code equations to showcase its acceptance and superior performance. It is observed that the ML model provides a quick and accurate estimate of the axial capacity of CFSST columns by overcoming the limitations of existing design codes. For identifying the resistance factor for the CatB model, reliability analysis is also performed following AISC 360–16 provision. Finally, an interactive graphical user interface is developed for practicing engineers to enhance the accuracy of CFSST axial capacity prediction while promoting the use of interpretable ML models.

StructuresVol. 73
University of Calgary (CA), Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.