Changing spatial inclusion of migrants in Chinese cities: How housing matters

Amid mass migration and socio-spatial segregation, social inclusion has been emphasized in urban policy agendas globally. While previous research has explored the inclusion of migrants or different educational groups, few studies have combined education, the important factor influencing housing access, with migration, to explore multi-dimensional inclusion. Drawing on the sixth (Year 2010) and seventh (Year 2020) population censuses and multi-source housing data at the subdistrict level in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, this study investigates migrants' spatial inclusion patterns considering their educational backgrounds and examines the spatially varying relations between inclusion and housing. The findings reveal that from 2010 to 2020, inclusive areas for both less-educated and educated migrants in the two cities experienced an outward expansion. While crowded housing hindered spatial inclusion, with the strongest effects usually observed in Guangzhou's central areas but shifting from Shenzhen's central areas to urban peripheries during 2010–2020, tenure mix facilitated it, particularly in the two cities' suburban areas. Guangzhou exhibited distinct institutional powers, with right-of-use housing contributing to higher inclusion. However, Shenzhen was significantly shaped by market forces, supplemented by institutional and informal influences, with commodity housing, affordable housing, right-of-use housing, resettlement housing, and urban villages related to different dimensions of inclusion in distinct areas. This study contributes to the discourse on social inclusion by broadening its dimensions and provides valuable insights for promoting inclusive cities through housing policymaking. • Inclusive areas in both cities experienced an outward expansion during 2010–2020. • The relationship between inclusion and housing is spatially varying. • Crowded housing impeded inclusion while tenure mix facilitated it. • Migrants' inclusion in Guangzhou was influenced by institutional arrangements. • Migrants' inclusion in Shenzhen was significantly shaped by market forces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Habitat International
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103319
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changing spatial inclusion of migrants in Chinese cities: How housing matters

Yilong Dai, Chenyang Zhang, Fubin Luo, Yunzheng Zhang
11 citations
Habitat International
Migration and Labor Dynamics
46.22
article

Changing spatial inclusion of migrants in Chinese cities: How housing matters

Yilong Dai, Chenyang Zhang, Fubin Luo, Yunzheng Zhang
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Amid mass migration and socio-spatial segregation, social inclusion has been emphasized in urban policy agendas globally. While previous research has explored the inclusion of migrants or different educational groups, few studies have combined education, the important factor influencing housing access, with migration, to explore multi-dimensional inclusion. Drawing on the sixth (Year 2010) and seventh (Year 2020) population censuses and multi-source housing data at the subdistrict level in Guangzhou and Shenzhen, this study investigates migrants' spatial inclusion patterns considering their educational backgrounds and examines the spatially varying relations between inclusion and housing. The findings reveal that from 2010 to 2020, inclusive areas for both less-educated and educated migrants in the two cities experienced an outward expansion. While crowded housing hindered spatial inclusion, with the strongest effects usually observed in Guangzhou's central areas but shifting from Shenzhen's central areas to urban peripheries during 2010–2020, tenure mix facilitated it, particularly in the two cities' suburban areas. Guangzhou exhibited distinct institutional powers, with right-of-use housing contributing to higher inclusion. However, Shenzhen was significantly shaped by market forces, supplemented by institutional and informal influences, with commodity housing, affordable housing, right-of-use housing, resettlement housing, and urban villages related to different dimensions of inclusion in distinct areas. This study contributes to the discourse on social inclusion by broadening its dimensions and provides valuable insights for promoting inclusive cities through housing policymaking. • Inclusive areas in both cities experienced an outward expansion during 2010–2020. • The relationship between inclusion and housing is spatially varying. • Crowded housing impeded inclusion while tenure mix facilitated it. • Migrants' inclusion in Guangzhou was influenced by institutional arrangements. • Migrants' inclusion in Shenzhen was significantly shaped by market forces.

Habitat InternationalVol. 157
City University of Hong Kong (HK), UNSW Sydney (AU), Southeast University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
46.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.