Utilisation of subsidised genetic and genomic testing in a publicly funded healthcare system 2014–2023

The Australian government subsidises medical services, including several genetic and genomic tests, through a federal funding scheme. We explore trends and variation in the utilisation of the publicly funded genetic and genomic tests over the last decade. We make use of administrative data of the listed genetic and genomic tests from financial year 2014 to 2023. In 2023, 102 genetic and nine genomic tests were publicly subsidised across 65 distinct clinical test indications, up from 32 items across 20 distinct tests in 2014. Service volumes have increased by 50% from 250,881 to 376,140, and benefits paid have risen by 83% from AU$42.0 million to AU$76.8 million. This accounts for 0.3% of the total AU$27.6 billion expenditure on publicly subsidised medical services in 2023. Somatic cancer, rare disease, and reproductive tests are the most prevalent tests. Women of childbearing ages used more services than men, however in nonchildbearing ages, men used more services than women. The current usage of publicly funded genetic and genomic testing within Australia is relatively modest, underscoring challenges in integration to routine clinical practice. However, the recent rapid expansion of subsidised items indicates that investments into genomics research are beginning to yield the evidence necessary to secure public funding for these services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-025-01801-4
Citations
10
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utilisation of subsidised genetic and genomic testing in a publicly funded healthcare system 2014–2023

Ilias Goranitis, Melissa Martyn, Zornitza Stark, Kim Dalziel et al.
10 citations
European Journal of Human Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
18.17
article

Utilisation of subsidised genetic and genomic testing in a publicly funded healthcare system 2014–2023

Ilias Goranitis, Melissa Martyn, Zornitza Stark, Kim Dalziel, Chris Schilling, Clara Gaff, Florencia Sjaaf
article en
10 citations

Abstract

The Australian government subsidises medical services, including several genetic and genomic tests, through a federal funding scheme. We explore trends and variation in the utilisation of the publicly funded genetic and genomic tests over the last decade. We make use of administrative data of the listed genetic and genomic tests from financial year 2014 to 2023. In 2023, 102 genetic and nine genomic tests were publicly subsidised across 65 distinct clinical test indications, up from 32 items across 20 distinct tests in 2014. Service volumes have increased by 50% from 250,881 to 376,140, and benefits paid have risen by 83% from AU$42.0 million to AU$76.8 million. This accounts for 0.3% of the total AU$27.6 billion expenditure on publicly subsidised medical services in 2023. Somatic cancer, rare disease, and reproductive tests are the most prevalent tests. Women of childbearing ages used more services than men, however in nonchildbearing ages, men used more services than women. The current usage of publicly funded genetic and genomic testing within Australia is relatively modest, underscoring challenges in integration to routine clinical practice. However, the recent rapid expansion of subsidised items indicates that investments into genomics research are beginning to yield the evidence necessary to secure public funding for these services.

European Journal of Human GeneticsVol. 33(8)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research (AU), Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
18.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.