Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study

This study evaluates upadacitinib (UPA) effectiveness and drug retention rate (DRR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Multicentre prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with RA receiving UPA were evaluated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Key outcomes included UPA DRR and changes in clinical and serological measures over time. The study included 215 patients (72.6% female sex, mean age 60.1 ± 11.7 years). The DRR of UPA was 91.6% (95% CI 88.0-95.4%) at 6 months, 84.6% (95% CI 79.8-89.7%) at 12 months, 80.3% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 18 months and 80% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 24 months. UPA DRR was similar between monotherapy and methotrexate combination (p = 0.47), and across different treatment lines (p = 0.58). A statistically significant improvement from baseline was observed over 24 months considering erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-CRP, Physician's (Ph) and Patient's (Pt) Global Assessment (GA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI and CDAI) (p < 0.00 for all of them). Patients discontinuing UPA were more likely to be male (p = 0.02), with a longer disease duration (p = 0.03), higher baseline values of VAS Pain (p < 0.00), PtGA (p < 0.00), PhGA (p < 0.00), CDAI (p < 0.00), SDAI (p < 0.00) and corticosteroid dosage (p = 0.04). This study confirms UPA effectiveness in managing RA in the real-world practice, demonstrating sustained drug retention and improvements in clinical and laboratory measures over time. Also, UPA could be a valuable option for patients with multi-refractory RA and when monotherapy is preferred.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study

Caterina Baldi, Emilio D’Ignazio, Andrea Picchianti Diamanti, Bruno Frediani et al.
7 citations
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
11.68
article

Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study

Caterina Baldi, Emilio D’Ignazio, Andrea Picchianti Diamanti, Bruno Frediani, Anna Panaccione, Laura Niccoli, L. Di Cato, Massimiliano Cazzato, Chiara De Lorenzo, Andrea Delle Sedie, Serena Guiducci, Maurizio Benucci, Stefano Gentileschi, Andrea Di Matteo, Carla Gaggiano, Francesca Li Gobbi, Carlotta Nannini, Gemma Lepri
article en
7 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates upadacitinib (UPA) effectiveness and drug retention rate (DRR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Multicentre prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with RA receiving UPA were evaluated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Key outcomes included UPA DRR and changes in clinical and serological measures over time. The study included 215 patients (72.6% female sex, mean age 60.1 ± 11.7 years). The DRR of UPA was 91.6% (95% CI 88.0-95.4%) at 6 months, 84.6% (95% CI 79.8-89.7%) at 12 months, 80.3% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 18 months and 80% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 24 months. UPA DRR was similar between monotherapy and methotrexate combination (p = 0.47), and across different treatment lines (p = 0.58). A statistically significant improvement from baseline was observed over 24 months considering erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-CRP, Physician's (Ph) and Patient's (Pt) Global Assessment (GA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI and CDAI) (p < 0.00 for all of them). Patients discontinuing UPA were more likely to be male (p = 0.02), with a longer disease duration (p = 0.03), higher baseline values of VAS Pain (p < 0.00), PtGA (p < 0.00), PhGA (p < 0.00), CDAI (p < 0.00), SDAI (p < 0.00) and corticosteroid dosage (p = 0.04). This study confirms UPA effectiveness in managing RA in the real-world practice, demonstrating sustained drug retention and improvements in clinical and laboratory measures over time. Also, UPA could be a valuable option for patients with multi-refractory RA and when monotherapy is preferred.

Clinical and Experimental MedicineVol. 25(1)
University of Siena (IT), University of Pisa (IT), University of Leeds (GB), Santa Maria Nuova Hospital (IT), Nuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio (IT), NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit (GB), Hospital of Prato (IT), University of Florence (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Università degli Studi di Siena
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
11.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.