Spatialities of remote work across the EU regions in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic: Regional change, factors, interlinkages

One of the most important implications of Covid-19 pertains to increasing trends of remote work, due to lockdown measures, mainly in knowledge-intensive sectors, that have changed work-life balance. These changes unfold unevenly among countries and regions, since, for instance, urban areas have a larger share of jobs that could be performed remotely. This paper studies how and why remote work unfolds unevenly across space in the context of Covid-19, thus enriching our understanding of shifting spatial organization of work after the pandemic arose. Particularly, using secondary figures from Eurostat and adopts fixed-effects and spatial error regression analysis in 217 EU NUTS2 regions with remote work rate in 2020 and the annual change between 2019 and 2020 as dependent variables. The paper then in-depth discusses and integrates the results into the regional socio-economic environment through two regions case-studies to better contextualize the findings. The results highlight the geographically uneven changes in the organization of work and the regional variation in remote working across the EU in the context of Covid-19. The regional industrial structure, policies to contain Covid-19, regional structural elements and demographics proved to be key factors of the spatialities of remote work. • Covid-19 triggered an enormous increase of remote working in the EU regions. • The changes in the organization of work geographically uneven. • The regional variation in remote working across the EU was clustered. • Covid-19 mitigation policies and regional industrial structure were key factors. • Regional structural elements and demographics were also important.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geography
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103531
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatialities of remote work across the EU regions in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic: Regional change, factors, interlinkages

Nikos Kapitsinis
13 citations
Applied Geography
Employment and Welfare Studies
36.60
article

Spatialities of remote work across the EU regions in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic: Regional change, factors, interlinkages

Nikos Kapitsinis
article en
13 citations

Abstract

One of the most important implications of Covid-19 pertains to increasing trends of remote work, due to lockdown measures, mainly in knowledge-intensive sectors, that have changed work-life balance. These changes unfold unevenly among countries and regions, since, for instance, urban areas have a larger share of jobs that could be performed remotely. This paper studies how and why remote work unfolds unevenly across space in the context of Covid-19, thus enriching our understanding of shifting spatial organization of work after the pandemic arose. Particularly, using secondary figures from Eurostat and adopts fixed-effects and spatial error regression analysis in 217 EU NUTS2 regions with remote work rate in 2020 and the annual change between 2019 and 2020 as dependent variables. The paper then in-depth discusses and integrates the results into the regional socio-economic environment through two regions case-studies to better contextualize the findings. The results highlight the geographically uneven changes in the organization of work and the regional variation in remote working across the EU in the context of Covid-19. The regional industrial structure, policies to contain Covid-19, regional structural elements and demographics proved to be key factors of the spatialities of remote work. • Covid-19 triggered an enormous increase of remote working in the EU regions. • The changes in the organization of work geographically uneven. • The regional variation in remote working across the EU was clustered. • Covid-19 mitigation policies and regional industrial structure were key factors. • Regional structural elements and demographics were also important.

Applied GeographyVol. 176
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Employment and Welfare Studies
36.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.