“That’s a bit of a tight squeeze!”: A thematic analysis of narrow passage driving interactions using the Perceptual Cycle model

• Limited research exists on the relationship between what drivers perceive, how they interpret it, and their actions during narrow passage interactions. • To rectify this, an on-road study was conducted with participants verbalising their thoughts, followed by a retrospective interview. • Drivers consider four aspects of the environment: the road narrowing, the interaction partner, give way gaps & surrounding vehicles. • Drivers use this information to evaluate five key questions, considered in tandem, to safely resolve narrow passage interactions. • The study also suggests that an informal “convoy” rule and three possible outcomes exist during narrow passage interactions. The ability to accurately represent driver behaviours in microscopic traffic models and for autonomous vehicles to discern human driving behaviours is reliant on having a deep understanding of the behaviour that is being modelled. In spite of this, the decision-making processes undertaken during narrow passage interactions, a high risk and relatively unregulated situation in which a road narrowing means that two opposing vehicles cannot pass through at the same time, remain under investigated. To rectify this limitation, an on-road “think aloud” study was conducted with participants in the UK and supplemented by a video-cued retrospective interview using a shortened version of the Schema World Action Research Method. 175 decision points were then analysed using Neisser’s Perceptual Cycle Model, which highlights the relationships between the information perceived from the narrow passage environment, a driver’s schema, and the actions taken. It was found that drivers conduct four key assessments, including evaluating their interaction partner’s intention and the suitability of give way gaps on both sides of the road, when deciding what actions to take during a narrow passage interaction. These results provide a clearer understanding of how driver behaviour is influenced by different contextual/situational factors in a safety critical driving situation and helps ensure that future mathematical models better reflect driver decision-making during narrow passage interactions. This, in turn, can be used to ensure that autonomous vehicles are able to safely interact with human drivers at narrow passages and that microscopic traffic models are able to produce more accurate outputs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.038
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“That’s a bit of a tight squeeze!”: A thematic analysis of narrow passage driving interactions using the Perceptual Cycle model

Katherine L. Plant, Ben Waterson, Peter Youssef
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

“That’s a bit of a tight squeeze!”: A thematic analysis of narrow passage driving interactions using the Perceptual Cycle model

Katherine L. Plant, Ben Waterson, Peter Youssef
article en

Abstract

• Limited research exists on the relationship between what drivers perceive, how they interpret it, and their actions during narrow passage interactions. • To rectify this, an on-road study was conducted with participants verbalising their thoughts, followed by a retrospective interview. • Drivers consider four aspects of the environment: the road narrowing, the interaction partner, give way gaps & surrounding vehicles. • Drivers use this information to evaluate five key questions, considered in tandem, to safely resolve narrow passage interactions. • The study also suggests that an informal “convoy” rule and three possible outcomes exist during narrow passage interactions. The ability to accurately represent driver behaviours in microscopic traffic models and for autonomous vehicles to discern human driving behaviours is reliant on having a deep understanding of the behaviour that is being modelled. In spite of this, the decision-making processes undertaken during narrow passage interactions, a high risk and relatively unregulated situation in which a road narrowing means that two opposing vehicles cannot pass through at the same time, remain under investigated. To rectify this limitation, an on-road “think aloud” study was conducted with participants in the UK and supplemented by a video-cued retrospective interview using a shortened version of the Schema World Action Research Method. 175 decision points were then analysed using Neisser’s Perceptual Cycle Model, which highlights the relationships between the information perceived from the narrow passage environment, a driver’s schema, and the actions taken. It was found that drivers conduct four key assessments, including evaluating their interaction partner’s intention and the suitability of give way gaps on both sides of the road, when deciding what actions to take during a narrow passage interaction. These results provide a clearer understanding of how driver behaviour is influenced by different contextual/situational factors in a safety critical driving situation and helps ensure that future mathematical models better reflect driver decision-making during narrow passage interactions. This, in turn, can be used to ensure that autonomous vehicles are able to safely interact with human drivers at narrow passages and that microscopic traffic models are able to produce more accurate outputs.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 109
University of Southampton (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.