An era of pivoting: a collaborative retrospective analysis (CRA) on conducting qualitative research amidst the dueling pandemics

Purpose The COVID-19 global health pandemic brought much of qualitative research to a halt causing researchers to pivot from initial research plans and reimagine the possibilities of their scholarship. Accordingly, we sought to understand how the abrupt pivot to virtual methodologies could influence qualitative research in this context and future contexts. Design/methodology/approach To explore how two concurrent studies were impacted, we conducted a Collaborative Retrospective Analysis (CRA). We share results from a secondary analysis of two individual studies conducted concurrently by the authors. Findings The paper puts forth lessons learned concerning redesigning qualitative studies, engagement with vulnerable populations and application for ethical considerations. Originality/value We advance qualitative research methods by conducting a CRA of two concurrent, but separate studies. We put forth implications for designing qualitative studies in a re-envisioned and increasingly hybrid world and we share collaborative practices gleaned throughout the research process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research Journal
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-07-2024-0147
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An era of pivoting: a collaborative retrospective analysis (CRA) on conducting qualitative research amidst the dueling pandemics

Lydia Gandy-Fastovich, Sarah Lent
1 citations
Qualitative Research Journal
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
4.20
article

An era of pivoting: a collaborative retrospective analysis (CRA) on conducting qualitative research amidst the dueling pandemics

Lydia Gandy-Fastovich, Sarah Lent
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The COVID-19 global health pandemic brought much of qualitative research to a halt causing researchers to pivot from initial research plans and reimagine the possibilities of their scholarship. Accordingly, we sought to understand how the abrupt pivot to virtual methodologies could influence qualitative research in this context and future contexts. Design/methodology/approach To explore how two concurrent studies were impacted, we conducted a Collaborative Retrospective Analysis (CRA). We share results from a secondary analysis of two individual studies conducted concurrently by the authors. Findings The paper puts forth lessons learned concerning redesigning qualitative studies, engagement with vulnerable populations and application for ethical considerations. Originality/value We advance qualitative research methods by conducting a CRA of two concurrent, but separate studies. We put forth implications for designing qualitative studies in a re-envisioned and increasingly hybrid world and we share collaborative practices gleaned throughout the research process.

Qualitative Research Journal
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.