Constraining Soil Hydrothermal CO<sub>2</sub> Degassing Across the Changbaishan Volcanic Area: Insights From <sup>13</sup>C‐<sup>14</sup>C Perspective

Abstract Soil hydrothermal CO 2 represents important forms of diffuse degassing in volcanic areas, but the corresponding CO 2 output remains unclear. Herein, we investigated geochemical features of soil gas, that is, soil gas components, carbon isotopic compositions of soil CO 2 (δ 13 C‐CO 2 and Δ 14 C‐CO 2 ), and soil CO 2 fluxes in the Changbaishan volcanic area (CHV). The geochemical characteristics of soil gas in diffuse degassing structures differed significantly from those in volcano‐affected structures. Specifically, soil CO 2 concentrations were up to 2.5 × 10 5 ppm, with δ 13 C‐CO 2 values ranging from −6.2‰ to −1.6‰ and Δ 14 C‐CO 2 values spanning from −996‰ to −845‰, showing significant hydrothermal CO 2 signatures. The isotopic mixing model was constructed to estimate the contribution of hydrothermal, biogenic, and atmospheric CO 2 to soil CO 2 . The results showed that soil CO 2 in diffuse degassing structures was predominantly derived from hydrothermal CO 2 , while soil CO 2 in the volcano‐affected structures was mainly derived from biogenic CO 2 . Combined with the soil CO 2 fluxes, it was concluded that the hydrothermal CO 2 output through soil degassing was 5.83 × 10 4 t yr −1 in CHV, significantly lower than previous estimates. We found that hydrothermal CO 2 release in CHV exceeded the CO 2 consumption through silicate weathering, thereby acting as the carbon source. We also estimated the hydrothermal soil CO 2 output from global volcanoes based on literature‐published values from 80‐degassing volcanoes, which was ∼150 Mt yr −1 . Our results highlighted the importance of conducting 13 C‐ 14 C investigations in global volcanic areas to replenish the database of hydrothermal CO 2 output in different forms and subsequently evaluate their climatic implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gc011914
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraining Soil Hydrothermal CO2 Degassing Across the Changbaishan Volcanic Area: Insights From 13C‐14C Perspective

Maoliang Zhang, Jun Zhong, Sheng Xu, Linan Wang et al.
4 citations
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
3.45
article

Constraining Soil Hydrothermal CO2 Degassing Across the Changbaishan Volcanic Area: Insights From 13C‐14C Perspective

Maoliang Zhang, Jun Zhong, Sheng Xu, Linan Wang, Si‐Liang Li, Guoming Liu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Soil hydrothermal CO 2 represents important forms of diffuse degassing in volcanic areas, but the corresponding CO 2 output remains unclear. Herein, we investigated geochemical features of soil gas, that is, soil gas components, carbon isotopic compositions of soil CO 2 (δ 13 C‐CO 2 and Δ 14 C‐CO 2 ), and soil CO 2 fluxes in the Changbaishan volcanic area (CHV). The geochemical characteristics of soil gas in diffuse degassing structures differed significantly from those in volcano‐affected structures. Specifically, soil CO 2 concentrations were up to 2.5 × 10 5 ppm, with δ 13 C‐CO 2 values ranging from −6.2‰ to −1.6‰ and Δ 14 C‐CO 2 values spanning from −996‰ to −845‰, showing significant hydrothermal CO 2 signatures. The isotopic mixing model was constructed to estimate the contribution of hydrothermal, biogenic, and atmospheric CO 2 to soil CO 2 . The results showed that soil CO 2 in diffuse degassing structures was predominantly derived from hydrothermal CO 2 , while soil CO 2 in the volcano‐affected structures was mainly derived from biogenic CO 2 . Combined with the soil CO 2 fluxes, it was concluded that the hydrothermal CO 2 output through soil degassing was 5.83 × 10 4 t yr −1 in CHV, significantly lower than previous estimates. We found that hydrothermal CO 2 release in CHV exceeded the CO 2 consumption through silicate weathering, thereby acting as the carbon source. We also estimated the hydrothermal soil CO 2 output from global volcanoes based on literature‐published values from 80‐degassing volcanoes, which was ∼150 Mt yr −1 . Our results highlighted the importance of conducting 13 C‐ 14 C investigations in global volcanic areas to replenish the database of hydrothermal CO 2 output in different forms and subsequently evaluate their climatic implications.

Geochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsVol. 26(2)
Tianjin University (CN), Alaska Volcano Observatory (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
3.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.