A protocol to optimize non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation

This randomized controlled trial investigates the optimal dosing for post-stroke rehabilitation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Previous studies demonstrated improvements in cognitive and motor functions with specific intensities of rTMS and tDCS, but this trial explores various frequencies and currents to optimize therapeutic outcomes. A total of 128 post-stroke patients (within 1-6 months of stroke) with paraplegia or hemiplegia are recruited. Patients are divided into four groups for both rTMS (n = 49) and tDCS (n = 49): three groups with different stimulation intensities (1 Hz, 5 Hz, 10 Hz for rTMS; 0.5 mA, 1 mA, 2 mA for tDCS) and a sham control group. Along with this, there is a standard therapy group (n = 30) as control. Participants receive 20 min sessions, five days a week, over six weeks. Cognitive and motor assessments are conducted at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months to measure short-term and sustained effects.•Hemodynamically stable post-stroke patients randomized in four groups in rTMS and tDCS each and their baseline cognitive and motor function assessed•Application of the two types of therapy for 6 weeks•Checking improvement of cognitive and motor function and compare the improvement among subgroups of recipient of various frequencies and currents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103209
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A protocol to optimize non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation

Ayesha Juhi, Shreya Sharma, Himel Mondal, Suman Dhaka et al.
5 citations
MethodsX
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
4.21
article

A protocol to optimize non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation

Ayesha Juhi, Shreya Sharma, Himel Mondal, Suman Dhaka, Manul Das, Preeti Chaudhary, Chanchal Goyal, Rajesh Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Mohd Faisal Khan, Dinesh Bhatia
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial investigates the optimal dosing for post-stroke rehabilitation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Previous studies demonstrated improvements in cognitive and motor functions with specific intensities of rTMS and tDCS, but this trial explores various frequencies and currents to optimize therapeutic outcomes. A total of 128 post-stroke patients (within 1-6 months of stroke) with paraplegia or hemiplegia are recruited. Patients are divided into four groups for both rTMS (n = 49) and tDCS (n = 49): three groups with different stimulation intensities (1 Hz, 5 Hz, 10 Hz for rTMS; 0.5 mA, 1 mA, 2 mA for tDCS) and a sham control group. Along with this, there is a standard therapy group (n = 30) as control. Participants receive 20 min sessions, five days a week, over six weeks. Cognitive and motor assessments are conducted at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months to measure short-term and sustained effects.•Hemodynamically stable post-stroke patients randomized in four groups in rTMS and tDCS each and their baseline cognitive and motor function assessed•Application of the two types of therapy for 6 weeks•Checking improvement of cognitive and motor function and compare the improvement among subgroups of recipient of various frequencies and currents.

MethodsXVol. 14
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur (IN), North Eastern Hill University (IN), Indian Council of Medical Research (IN), Regional Medical Research Centre (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar (IN), Central Institute of Psychiatry (IN)
Indian Council of Medical Research, All-India Institute of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.