The importance of accounting for the Tolman correction to surface tension for nucleation and growth modeling of Fe clusters

Gibbs free energies of clusters are required for predictive modeling of cluster growth during condensation of a cooling vapor. Here, we present a straightforward method of calculating free energies of cluster formation using the data from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We apply this method to iron clusters having from 2 to 100 atoms. The energies obtained are verified by comparing to an MD-simulated equilibrium cluster size distribution in a sub-saturated vapor. We show that these free energies differ significantly from those obtained with a commonly used spherical cluster approximation, which relies on a surface tension coefficient of a flat surface, as it is used in the classical nucleation theory (CNT). We show that the spherical cluster approximation in CNT can be improved by using a cluster-size-dependent Tolman correction for the surface tension. The Tolman length and effective surface tension values were derived for iron clusters, and they significantly differ from the commonly used experimentally measured values. This improved approximation does not account for geometric magic number effects responsible for spikes and troughs in densities of neighbor cluster sizes. Nonetheless, it allows to more accurately model cluster formation from a cooling vapor. It better reproduces the condensation timeline, overall shape of the cluster size distribution, average cluster size, and the distribution width. In contrast, using a constant surface tension coefficient (as done in CNT) resulted in incorrect condensation dynamics and cluster size distributions. The analytical expression for cluster nucleation rate from CNT was updated to account for the size-dependence of cluster surface tension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerosol Science and Technology
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2025.2452895
Citations
1
Primary Topic
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The importance of accounting for the Tolman correction to surface tension for nucleation and growth modeling of Fe clusters

Igor Kaganovich, Yuri Barsukov, Alexander Khrabry, David B. Graves et al.
1 citations
Aerosol Science and Technology
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
1.30
article

The importance of accounting for the Tolman correction to surface tension for nucleation and growth modeling of Fe clusters

Igor Kaganovich, Yuri Barsukov, Alexander Khrabry, David B. Graves, Louis E. S. Hoffenberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gibbs free energies of clusters are required for predictive modeling of cluster growth during condensation of a cooling vapor. Here, we present a straightforward method of calculating free energies of cluster formation using the data from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We apply this method to iron clusters having from 2 to 100 atoms. The energies obtained are verified by comparing to an MD-simulated equilibrium cluster size distribution in a sub-saturated vapor. We show that these free energies differ significantly from those obtained with a commonly used spherical cluster approximation, which relies on a surface tension coefficient of a flat surface, as it is used in the classical nucleation theory (CNT). We show that the spherical cluster approximation in CNT can be improved by using a cluster-size-dependent Tolman correction for the surface tension. The Tolman length and effective surface tension values were derived for iron clusters, and they significantly differ from the commonly used experimentally measured values. This improved approximation does not account for geometric magic number effects responsible for spikes and troughs in densities of neighbor cluster sizes. Nonetheless, it allows to more accurately model cluster formation from a cooling vapor. It better reproduces the condensation timeline, overall shape of the cluster size distribution, average cluster size, and the distribution width. In contrast, using a constant surface tension coefficient (as done in CNT) resulted in incorrect condensation dynamics and cluster size distributions. The analytical expression for cluster nucleation rate from CNT was updated to account for the size-dependence of cluster surface tension.

Aerosol Science and TechnologyVol. 59(6)
Princeton University (US), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.