Moving forward: a call for Critical ADHD Studies

Highly effective early autistic activism gave considerable impetus to changes in the way autism research is conceived and carried out, notably through Critical Autism Studies (CAS). Little, though, has been similarly formalised challenging pathology-driven views of other forms of neurodivergence in research. However, there are increasing signs that this is changing, perhaps most particularly concerning ADHD. Here, we propose a tentative outline for what a Critical ADHD Studies – drawing on, bleeding into, and yet retaining its own specificities from both CAS and emergent Neurodiversity Studies – might resemble. This is neither a gate-keeping exercise nor a definitive mapping out of a field. Neither is ‘critical’, here, concerned with discussion of the validity of ADHD diagnoses. Rather, we seek points of intersection and of potential ally-ship, pulling together approaches centring ADHD lived experience, depathologisation, and ADHD affirmative world-making with related fields such as CAS and Neurodiversity Studies.<br/><br/>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2025.2458016
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moving forward: a call for Critical ADHD Studies

David Jackson‐Perry, Andrew Ivan Brown, Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist
5 citations
Disability & Society
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
7.36
article

Moving forward: a call for Critical ADHD Studies

David Jackson‐Perry, Andrew Ivan Brown, Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Highly effective early autistic activism gave considerable impetus to changes in the way autism research is conceived and carried out, notably through Critical Autism Studies (CAS). Little, though, has been similarly formalised challenging pathology-driven views of other forms of neurodivergence in research. However, there are increasing signs that this is changing, perhaps most particularly concerning ADHD. Here, we propose a tentative outline for what a Critical ADHD Studies – drawing on, bleeding into, and yet retaining its own specificities from both CAS and emergent Neurodiversity Studies – might resemble. This is neither a gate-keeping exercise nor a definitive mapping out of a field. Neither is ‘critical’, here, concerned with discussion of the validity of ADHD diagnoses. Rather, we seek points of intersection and of potential ally-ship, pulling together approaches centring ADHD lived experience, depathologisation, and ADHD affirmative world-making with related fields such as CAS and Neurodiversity Studies.<br/><br/>

Disability & SocietyVol. 40(12)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Södertörn University (SE), University of Washington (US), Queen's University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
7.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Moving forward: a call for Critical ADHD Studies — David Jackson‐Perry, Andrew Ivan Brown, et al. · Disability & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS