Somatosensory and clinical profiles of patients with spine-related and clinical framework-based neck–arm pain

Spine-related neck-arm pain is heterogeneous and may present on a spectrum between nociceptive and neuropathic pain. A recently developed mechanism-based clinical framework for spine-related pain distinguishes between spinally referred pain without neurological deficits (somatic referred pain, heightened nerve mechanosensitivity, radicular pain), with neurological deficits (radiculopathy), and mixed-pain presentations. This study investigated differences in somatosensory and clinical profiles of patients with unilateral spine-related neck-arm pain grouped according to the clinical framework. Patients (n = 113) underwent a clinical examination, after which they were classified into a subgroup(s). They completed questionnaires to assess function (Neck Disability Index), psychosocial factors (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing scale, Depression, anxiety, and stress scale), neuropathic pain (Douleur neuropathique 4), and central sensitization features (Central Sensitization Inventory). Standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed over the maximal pain area and contralateral side. The radiculopathy group showed a significant loss of function on the symptomatic vs asymptomatic side in cold ( P = 0.024) and warm detection ( P = 0.004), thermal sensory limen ( P = 0.001), mechanical detection ( P = 0.001), increased windup ratio ( P = 0.014), and cold hyperalgesia ( P = 0.049). No other subgroup showed significant side differences in QST parameters. Symptom descriptors, such as burning ( P < 0.031), tingling ( P < 0.018), pins and needles ( P < 0.031), numbness ( P < 0.016), spontaneous pain ( P < 0.001), and electric pain/shock ( P < 0.026) were more common in the radicular/radiculopathy groups compared with the somatic/mechanosensitivity groups. There were no differences in psychosocial parameters between the groups. The phenotypic profiles support the construct of the clinical examination and patient classification and its application in clinical practice according to a clinical framework for spine-related pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003516
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Somatosensory and clinical profiles of patients with spine-related and clinical framework-based neck–arm pain

Nikolaus Ballenberger, Annina B. Schmid, Brigitte Tampin, Kerstin Luedtke et al.
2 citations
Pain
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
article

Somatosensory and clinical profiles of patients with spine-related and clinical framework-based neck–arm pain

Nikolaus Ballenberger, Annina B. Schmid, Brigitte Tampin, Kerstin Luedtke, Camilla Kapitza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Spine-related neck-arm pain is heterogeneous and may present on a spectrum between nociceptive and neuropathic pain. A recently developed mechanism-based clinical framework for spine-related pain distinguishes between spinally referred pain without neurological deficits (somatic referred pain, heightened nerve mechanosensitivity, radicular pain), with neurological deficits (radiculopathy), and mixed-pain presentations. This study investigated differences in somatosensory and clinical profiles of patients with unilateral spine-related neck-arm pain grouped according to the clinical framework. Patients (n = 113) underwent a clinical examination, after which they were classified into a subgroup(s). They completed questionnaires to assess function (Neck Disability Index), psychosocial factors (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing scale, Depression, anxiety, and stress scale), neuropathic pain (Douleur neuropathique 4), and central sensitization features (Central Sensitization Inventory). Standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) was performed over the maximal pain area and contralateral side. The radiculopathy group showed a significant loss of function on the symptomatic vs asymptomatic side in cold ( P = 0.024) and warm detection ( P = 0.004), thermal sensory limen ( P = 0.001), mechanical detection ( P = 0.001), increased windup ratio ( P = 0.014), and cold hyperalgesia ( P = 0.049). No other subgroup showed significant side differences in QST parameters. Symptom descriptors, such as burning ( P < 0.031), tingling ( P < 0.018), pins and needles ( P < 0.031), numbness ( P < 0.016), spontaneous pain ( P < 0.001), and electric pain/shock ( P < 0.026) were more common in the radicular/radiculopathy groups compared with the somatic/mechanosensitivity groups. There were no differences in psychosocial parameters between the groups. The phenotypic profiles support the construct of the clinical examination and patient classification and its application in clinical practice according to a clinical framework for spine-related pain.

PainVol. 166(8)
Curtin University (AU), Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (AU), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Hochschule Osnabrück (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.