Can ChatGPT Solve Undergraduate Exams from Warehousing Studies? An Investigation

The performance of Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT, generally increases with every new model release. In this study, we investigated to what degree different GPT models were able to solve the exams of three different undergraduate courses on warehousing. We contribute to the discussion of ChatGPT’s existing logistics knowledge, particularly in the field of warehousing. Both the free version (GPT-4o mini) and the premium version (GPT-4o) completed three different warehousing exams using three different prompting techniques (with and without role assignments as logistics experts or students). The o1-preview model was also used (without a role assignment) for six runs. The tests were repeated three times. A total of 60 tests were conducted and compared with the in-class results of logistics students. The results show that the GPT models passed a total of 46 tests. The best run solved 93% of the exam correctly. Compared with the students from the respective semester, ChatGPT outperformed the students in one exam. In the other two exams, the students performed better on average than ChatGPT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14020052
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can ChatGPT Solve Undergraduate Exams from Warehousing Studies? An Investigation

Christoph Pott, Markus Pauly, Jérôme Rutinowski, Christopher Reining et al.
Computers
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Can ChatGPT Solve Undergraduate Exams from Warehousing Studies? An Investigation

Christoph Pott, Markus Pauly, Jérôme Rutinowski, Christopher Reining, Sven Franke, Alice Kirchheim
article en

Abstract

The performance of Large Language Models, such as ChatGPT, generally increases with every new model release. In this study, we investigated to what degree different GPT models were able to solve the exams of three different undergraduate courses on warehousing. We contribute to the discussion of ChatGPT’s existing logistics knowledge, particularly in the field of warehousing. Both the free version (GPT-4o mini) and the premium version (GPT-4o) completed three different warehousing exams using three different prompting techniques (with and without role assignments as logistics experts or students). The o1-preview model was also used (without a role assignment) for six runs. The tests were repeated three times. A total of 60 tests were conducted and compared with the in-class results of logistics students. The results show that the GPT models passed a total of 46 tests. The best run solved 93% of the exam correctly. Compared with the students from the respective semester, ChatGPT outperformed the students in one exam. In the other two exams, the students performed better on average than ChatGPT.

ComputersVol. 14(2)
TU Dortmund University (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can ChatGPT Solve Undergraduate Exams from Warehousing Studies? An Investigation — Christoph Pott, Markus Pauly, et al. · Computers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS