Diversity within? The paradox of social dominance and LGBTQ+ events

LGBTQ+ events can challenge social hierarchies as part of the social movement for equality, with event attendance assumed to reflect solidarity with this cause. Applying Social Dominance Theory, this study evaluates intra-group differences based on LGBTQ+ people’s social dominance orientation (SDO) and their degree of outness. Using a sequential mixed methods design in Australia, Study One (n = 420) uncovers three clusters: Hierarchy Supporters, Hierarchy Reformers, and Hierarchy Disruptors, in decreasing order of their SDO. These clusters differ not only on their event motivation and participation behaviours but also on their gender identities and sexual orientation. In Study Two (n = 12), we found event characteristics that were either hierarchy attenuating or enhancing. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that LGBTQ+ people differ in their SDO with event characteristics attenuating or enhancing social hierarchies. As such, LGBTQ+ events through their design elements can diminish social hierarchies to make LGBTQ+ events more inclusive for all queer people. Such events can also have a transformative potential for Hierarchy Supporters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2025.2455391
Citations
2
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversity within? The paradox of social dominance and LGBTQ+ events

Girish Prayag, Clifford Lewis, Faith Ong
2 citations
Journal of Sustainable Tourism
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
4.88
article

Diversity within? The paradox of social dominance and LGBTQ+ events

Girish Prayag, Clifford Lewis, Faith Ong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

LGBTQ+ events can challenge social hierarchies as part of the social movement for equality, with event attendance assumed to reflect solidarity with this cause. Applying Social Dominance Theory, this study evaluates intra-group differences based on LGBTQ+ people’s social dominance orientation (SDO) and their degree of outness. Using a sequential mixed methods design in Australia, Study One (n = 420) uncovers three clusters: Hierarchy Supporters, Hierarchy Reformers, and Hierarchy Disruptors, in decreasing order of their SDO. These clusters differ not only on their event motivation and participation behaviours but also on their gender identities and sexual orientation. In Study Two (n = 12), we found event characteristics that were either hierarchy attenuating or enhancing. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that LGBTQ+ people differ in their SDO with event characteristics attenuating or enhancing social hierarchies. As such, LGBTQ+ events through their design elements can diminish social hierarchies to make LGBTQ+ events more inclusive for all queer people. Such events can also have a transformative potential for Hierarchy Supporters.

Journal of Sustainable Tourism
Charles Sturt University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Canterbury (NZ), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Diversity within? The paradox of social dominance and LGBTQ+ events — Girish Prayag, Clifford Lewis, et al. · Journal of Sustainable Tourism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS