Citizen Acceptance of Co‐Designed Public Sector Innovation

ABSTRACT This experimental study examines user involvement in the co‐design stage of public sector innovations in relation to citizen acceptance of these innovations. We analyze 603 citizen evaluations of 12 co‐designed innovation prototypes. Results show that involving a few users can benefit many citizens. Partially co‐designed innovation prototypes, with users co‐defining the problem but professionals developing the solution, are perceived by citizens to be of higher quality than prototypes developed by professionals only, resulting in greater innovation acceptance in terms of perceived usefulness and ease of use. However, for fully co‐designed innovation prototypes, we do not find these positive results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13054
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizen Acceptance of Co‐Designed Public Sector Innovation

Remco S. Mannak, Murk Peutz, Iris Bomhof
1 citations
Public Administration
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
2.76
article

Citizen Acceptance of Co‐Designed Public Sector Innovation

Remco S. Mannak, Murk Peutz, Iris Bomhof
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This experimental study examines user involvement in the co‐design stage of public sector innovations in relation to citizen acceptance of these innovations. We analyze 603 citizen evaluations of 12 co‐designed innovation prototypes. Results show that involving a few users can benefit many citizens. Partially co‐designed innovation prototypes, with users co‐defining the problem but professionals developing the solution, are perceived by citizens to be of higher quality than prototypes developed by professionals only, resulting in greater innovation acceptance in terms of perceived usefulness and ease of use. However, for fully co‐designed innovation prototypes, we do not find these positive results.

Public AdministrationVol. 103(4)
Tilburg University (NL), Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Citizen Acceptance of Co‐Designed Public Sector Innovation — Remco S. Mannak, Murk Peutz, et al. · Public Administration (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS