The best of two worlds: toward large‐scale monitoring of biodiversity combining COI metabarcoding and optimized parataxonomic validation

In a context of unprecedented insect decline, it is critical to have reliable monitoring tools to measure species diversity and their dynamic at large‐scales. High‐throughput DNA‐based identification methods, and particularly metabarcoding, were proposed as an effective way to reach this aim. However, these identification methods are subject to multiple technical limitations, resulting in unavoidable false‐positive and false‐negative species detection. Moreover, metabarcoding does not allow a reliable estimation of species abundance in a given sample, which is key to document and detect population declines or range shifts at large scales. To overcome these obstacles, we propose here a human‐assisted molecular identification (HAMI) approach, a framework based on a combination of metabarcoding and image‐based parataxonomic validation of outputs and recording of abundance. We assessed the advantages of using HAMI over the exclusive use of a metabarcoding approach by examining 492 mixed beetle samples from a biodiversity monitoring initiative conducted throughout France. On average, 23% of the species are missed when relying exclusively on metabarcoding, this percent being consistently higher in species‐rich samples. Importantly, on average, 20% of the species identified by molecular‐only approaches correspond to false positives linked to cross‐sample contaminations or mis‐identified barcode sequences in databases. The combination of molecular methodologies and parataxonomic validation in HAMI significantly reduces the intrinsic biases of metabarcoding and recovers reliable abundance data. This approach also enables users to engage in a virtuous circle of database improvement through the identification of specimens associated with missing or incorrectly assigned barcodes. As such, HAMI fills an important gap in the toolbox available for fast and reliable biodiversity monitoring at large scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecography
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07699
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The best of two worlds: toward large‐scale monitoring of biodiversity combining COI metabarcoding and optimized parataxonomic validation

Anne‐Laure Clamens, Alain Migeon, Benoit Penel, Laure Benoit et al.
8 citations
Ecography
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
13.73
article

The best of two worlds: toward large‐scale monitoring of biodiversity combining COI metabarcoding and optimized parataxonomic validation

Anne‐Laure Clamens, Alain Migeon, Benoit Penel, Laure Benoit, Marie‐Pierre Chapuis, Christine N. Meynard, Sylvain Piry, Julien Haran, Gaël J. Kergoat, Laurent Soldati, Axel Boudonne
article en
8 citations

Abstract

In a context of unprecedented insect decline, it is critical to have reliable monitoring tools to measure species diversity and their dynamic at large‐scales. High‐throughput DNA‐based identification methods, and particularly metabarcoding, were proposed as an effective way to reach this aim. However, these identification methods are subject to multiple technical limitations, resulting in unavoidable false‐positive and false‐negative species detection. Moreover, metabarcoding does not allow a reliable estimation of species abundance in a given sample, which is key to document and detect population declines or range shifts at large scales. To overcome these obstacles, we propose here a human‐assisted molecular identification (HAMI) approach, a framework based on a combination of metabarcoding and image‐based parataxonomic validation of outputs and recording of abundance. We assessed the advantages of using HAMI over the exclusive use of a metabarcoding approach by examining 492 mixed beetle samples from a biodiversity monitoring initiative conducted throughout France. On average, 23% of the species are missed when relying exclusively on metabarcoding, this percent being consistently higher in species‐rich samples. Importantly, on average, 20% of the species identified by molecular‐only approaches correspond to false positives linked to cross‐sample contaminations or mis‐identified barcode sequences in databases. The combination of molecular methodologies and parataxonomic validation in HAMI significantly reduces the intrinsic biases of metabarcoding and recovers reliable abundance data. This approach also enables users to engage in a virtuous circle of database improvement through the identification of specimens associated with missing or incorrectly assigned barcodes. As such, HAMI fills an important gap in the toolbox available for fast and reliable biodiversity monitoring at large scales.

EcographyVol. 2025(6)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Institut Agro Montpellier (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), L'Institut Agro (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
13.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.