Myths and reality of the «socialist competition» in the 1930s. (according to the materials of the local press)

socialist competition in various forms and types.In particular, the press promoted such forms of production competition as mutual obligations, movement for the preparation and implementation of the technical and financial plan, household settlement teams, public tugboats.This was done for propaganda purposes, since a certain part of the workers believed in the necessity of the competition and enthusiastically joined it.The most widespread was the Stakhanov movement, as well as the use of the Kutafin method, the Kryvnosov movement, etc.However, the organization of the competition and the fulfillment of commitments were, as a rule, of a formal, propaganda nature.It was concluded that despite the efforts of the Communist Party and the government to attract workers to participate in various types of socialist competition, for the most part, the workers of the Hrystyniv railway junction mostly ignored the calls and did not favor the strikers.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kraêznavstvo
Published
2024-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15407/kraieznavstvo2024.02.067
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Myths and reality of the «socialist competition» in the 1930s. (according to the materials of the local press)

Petro Horokhivskyi
Kraêznavstvo
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
article

Myths and reality of the «socialist competition» in the 1930s. (according to the materials of the local press)

Petro Horokhivskyi
article en

Abstract

socialist competition in various forms and types.In particular, the press promoted such forms of production competition as mutual obligations, movement for the preparation and implementation of the technical and financial plan, household settlement teams, public tugboats.This was done for propaganda purposes, since a certain part of the workers believed in the necessity of the competition and enthusiastically joined it.The most widespread was the Stakhanov movement, as well as the use of the Kutafin method, the Kryvnosov movement, etc.However, the organization of the competition and the fulfillment of commitments were, as a rule, of a formal, propaganda nature.It was concluded that despite the efforts of the Communist Party and the government to attract workers to participate in various types of socialist competition, for the most part, the workers of the Hrystyniv railway junction mostly ignored the calls and did not favor the strikers.

Kraêznavstvo(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.