Refusing Algorithmic Recognition

Abstract The Black Technical Object retraces and problematizes the entanglements between technology, data and race. Ramon Amaro’s genealogy of racial sorting argues that machine learning is preconditioned by a prototypical Whiteness that relegates Black beings as objects measured against a White norm. In raising salient questions about technological, political and legal agency – which intersect with various modes of critique of algorithmic governance – I explore three main contributions the book makes to international law. First, machine learning and algorithmic decision-making are increasingly deployed in different domains of international law. The Black Technical Object speaks to emergent strands of scholarship that map how these developments reconfigure and disrupt key legal concepts and categories. Second, both the individual ‘subject’ and the collective ‘public’ of (international) law come into formation differently through these technological systems. Amaro helps us engage with these modalities of subject-making and understand their lineages and political stakes. Finally, the book provides a distinct political perspective of refusal and resistance – a refusal of recognition to resist the reinforcement of racial constructs (re)produced in the digital space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of International Law
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae068
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refusing Algorithmic Recognition

Marie Petersmann
1 links
European Journal of International Law
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Refusing Algorithmic Recognition

Marie Petersmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Black Technical Object retraces and problematizes the entanglements between technology, data and race. Ramon Amaro’s genealogy of racial sorting argues that machine learning is preconditioned by a prototypical Whiteness that relegates Black beings as objects measured against a White norm. In raising salient questions about technological, political and legal agency – which intersect with various modes of critique of algorithmic governance – I explore three main contributions the book makes to international law. First, machine learning and algorithmic decision-making are increasingly deployed in different domains of international law. The Black Technical Object speaks to emergent strands of scholarship that map how these developments reconfigure and disrupt key legal concepts and categories. Second, both the individual ‘subject’ and the collective ‘public’ of (international) law come into formation differently through these technological systems. Amaro helps us engage with these modalities of subject-making and understand their lineages and political stakes. Finally, the book provides a distinct political perspective of refusal and resistance – a refusal of recognition to resist the reinforcement of racial constructs (re)produced in the digital space.

European Journal of International LawVol. 35(4)
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.