Integration of life cycle sustainability assessment indicators in different energy sectors

Despite the increasing number of studies analysing sustainability performance in energy-related field, most of the existing papers present the results of particular dimensions separately. A number of methods have been identified to integrate individual LCSA indicators and determine one final sustainability score which could be a relevant support for decision-makers to rank scenarios being compared at the interpretation phase. In the current stage, none of the proposed methods seem to be in a leading position. The integration of sustainability indicators still suffers from the lack of harmonisation concerning the selection and definition of impact categories to be analysed, as well as specific procedures that would allow the results to be reliably compared. The procedures often assume arbitrarily determined weights of importance for aggregating environmental, economic and social scores, which can raise controversy. The development of noncontroversial methods to integrate LCSA indicators is also recommended from the perspective of future standardisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics and Environment
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.91.4.799
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Life Cycle Costing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of life cycle sustainability assessment indicators in different energy sectors

A. Marcinkowski, Paweł Haręża
1 citations
Economics and Environment
Life Cycle Costing Analysis
3.91
article

Integration of life cycle sustainability assessment indicators in different energy sectors

A. Marcinkowski, Paweł Haręża
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of studies analysing sustainability performance in energy-related field, most of the existing papers present the results of particular dimensions separately. A number of methods have been identified to integrate individual LCSA indicators and determine one final sustainability score which could be a relevant support for decision-makers to rank scenarios being compared at the interpretation phase. In the current stage, none of the proposed methods seem to be in a leading position. The integration of sustainability indicators still suffers from the lack of harmonisation concerning the selection and definition of impact categories to be analysed, as well as specific procedures that would allow the results to be reliably compared. The procedures often assume arbitrarily determined weights of importance for aggregating environmental, economic and social scores, which can raise controversy. The development of noncontroversial methods to integrate LCSA indicators is also recommended from the perspective of future standardisation.

Economics and EnvironmentVol. 91(4)
Lodz University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Life Cycle Costing Analysis
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integration of life cycle sustainability assessment indicators in different energy sectors — A. Marcinkowski, Paweł Haręża · Economics and Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS