Classification of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder with comorbid traits and deep learning algorithms

Many psychiatric disorders share genetic liabilities, but whether these shared liabilities can be utilized to classify and differentiate psychiatric disorders remains unclear. In this study, we use polygenic risk scores (PRSs) of 42 traits comorbid with schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BIP), and major depressive disorder (MDD) to evaluate their utilities. We found that combining target specific PRS with PRSs of comorbid traits can improve the classification of the target disorders. Importantly, without inclusion of PRSs from targeted disorders, we can still classify SCZ (accuracy 0.710 ± 0.008, AUC 0.789 ± 0.011), BIP (accuracy 0.782 ± 0.006, AUC 0.852 ± 0.004), and MDD (accuracy 0.753 ± 0.019, AUC 0.822 ± 0.010). Furthermore, PRSs from comorbid traits alone can effectively differentiate unaffected controls and patients with SCZ, BIP, and MDD (accuracy 0.861 ± 0.003, AUC 0.961 ± 0.041). Our results demonstrate that shared liabilities can be used effectively to improve the classification and differentiation of these disorders. The finding that PRSs from comorbid traits alone can classify and differentiate SCZ, BIP and MDD reasonably well implies that a majority of the risk variants composing target PRSs are shared with comorbid traits. Overall, our results suggest that a data-driven approach may be feasible to classify and differentiate these disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schizophrenia
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-025-00564-7
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder with comorbid traits and deep learning algorithms

Shizhong Han, Zhongming Zhao, Yimei Lu, Joan Manuel Cue et al.
5 citations
Schizophrenia
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
9.09
article

Classification of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder with comorbid traits and deep learning algorithms

Shizhong Han, Zhongming Zhao, Yimei Lu, Joan Manuel Cue, Jingchun Chen, Daniel R. Weinberger, Mira Han, Vishwajit L. Nimgaonkar, Xiangning Chen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Many psychiatric disorders share genetic liabilities, but whether these shared liabilities can be utilized to classify and differentiate psychiatric disorders remains unclear. In this study, we use polygenic risk scores (PRSs) of 42 traits comorbid with schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BIP), and major depressive disorder (MDD) to evaluate their utilities. We found that combining target specific PRS with PRSs of comorbid traits can improve the classification of the target disorders. Importantly, without inclusion of PRSs from targeted disorders, we can still classify SCZ (accuracy 0.710 ± 0.008, AUC 0.789 ± 0.011), BIP (accuracy 0.782 ± 0.006, AUC 0.852 ± 0.004), and MDD (accuracy 0.753 ± 0.019, AUC 0.822 ± 0.010). Furthermore, PRSs from comorbid traits alone can effectively differentiate unaffected controls and patients with SCZ, BIP, and MDD (accuracy 0.861 ± 0.003, AUC 0.961 ± 0.041). Our results demonstrate that shared liabilities can be used effectively to improve the classification and differentiation of these disorders. The finding that PRSs from comorbid traits alone can classify and differentiate SCZ, BIP and MDD reasonably well implies that a majority of the risk variants composing target PRSs are shared with comorbid traits. Overall, our results suggest that a data-driven approach may be feasible to classify and differentiate these disorders.

SchizophreniaVol. 11(1)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Lieber Institute for Brain Development (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US)
Eli Lilly and Company, University of Pennsylvania, Emory University, Northwestern University, Louisiana State University, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, National Institutes of Health, School of Medicine, Emory University, Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, U.S. National Library of Medicine
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
9.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.