The impact of financial distress on capital structure following Egypt's currency flotation: the moderating role of board characteristics and ownership structure

Purpose This study examines how financial distress affects the capital structure of Egyptian firms following the 2016 currency flotation, examining the moderating roles of board characteristics and ownership structure. Design/methodology/approach Utilizing data from non-financial companies listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange from 2017 to 2022, we apply two-stage least squares (2SLS) and propensity score matching (PSM) to address endogeneity and selection bias. Findings Our findings indicate that financially distressed firms tend to increase their debt burden, but robust governance mechanisms, such as higher board independence, larger boards and strong blockholder and institutional ownership, significantly mitigate this effect. Managerial ownership shows a stabilizing influence during distress, while chief executive officer duality does not significantly impact leverage decisions. These findings underscore how robust corporate governance promotes more conservative capital structure decisions during economic volatility. Research limitations/implications Our study focus, country and period could limit the generalizability of our findings to other regions or sectors. Practical implications Investors and policymakers are advised to focus on firms with effective governance structures to mitigate distress-induced leverage increases. Governance reforms that enhance board effectiveness and ownership structure, e.g. increasing board independence requirements and promoting greater institutional investor participation, can further stabilize capital structure during downturns. Managers, in turn, should diversify financing and adopt prudent debt strategies to reduce overreliance on leverage. Originality/value In contrast to most studies, this research reverses the lens by exploring how financial distress shapes capital structure decisions in an emerging market context, specifically post-Egypt’s 2016 currency flotation. Employing both 2SLS and PSM to address endogeneity and selection bias, the study highlights the mitigating role of governance mechanisms, which can buffer firms against heightened debt reliance under economic volatility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Accounting Research
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-04-2024-0151
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of financial distress on capital structure following Egypt's currency flotation: the moderating role of board characteristics and ownership structure

Mohamed Zaki Balboula, Mona Ahmed Ahmed Ahmed Shemes
8 citations
Journal of Applied Accounting Research
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
31.28
article

The impact of financial distress on capital structure following Egypt's currency flotation: the moderating role of board characteristics and ownership structure

Mohamed Zaki Balboula, Mona Ahmed Ahmed Ahmed Shemes
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study examines how financial distress affects the capital structure of Egyptian firms following the 2016 currency flotation, examining the moderating roles of board characteristics and ownership structure. Design/methodology/approach Utilizing data from non-financial companies listed on the Egyptian Stock Exchange from 2017 to 2022, we apply two-stage least squares (2SLS) and propensity score matching (PSM) to address endogeneity and selection bias. Findings Our findings indicate that financially distressed firms tend to increase their debt burden, but robust governance mechanisms, such as higher board independence, larger boards and strong blockholder and institutional ownership, significantly mitigate this effect. Managerial ownership shows a stabilizing influence during distress, while chief executive officer duality does not significantly impact leverage decisions. These findings underscore how robust corporate governance promotes more conservative capital structure decisions during economic volatility. Research limitations/implications Our study focus, country and period could limit the generalizability of our findings to other regions or sectors. Practical implications Investors and policymakers are advised to focus on firms with effective governance structures to mitigate distress-induced leverage increases. Governance reforms that enhance board effectiveness and ownership structure, e.g. increasing board independence requirements and promoting greater institutional investor participation, can further stabilize capital structure during downturns. Managers, in turn, should diversify financing and adopt prudent debt strategies to reduce overreliance on leverage. Originality/value In contrast to most studies, this research reverses the lens by exploring how financial distress shapes capital structure decisions in an emerging market context, specifically post-Egypt’s 2016 currency flotation. Employing both 2SLS and PSM to address endogeneity and selection bias, the study highlights the mitigating role of governance mechanisms, which can buffer firms against heightened debt reliance under economic volatility.

Journal of Applied Accounting ResearchVol. 26(3)
Boston University (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Delta University for Science and Technology (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
31.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.