Associated adverse outcomes with tumor treating fields when combined to temozolomide versus temozolomide alone for the treatment of glioblastoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Abstract Background Glioma is a brain tumor and glioblastoma represents its most common type, accounting for almost 40% of primary tumors of the central nervous system, and is associated with the worst prognosis. Glioblastoma remains one of the major challenges in neurooncology. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tumor treating fields (TTF) for the treatment of glioblastoma. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically assess the adverse outcomes associated with TTF when combined to temozolamide versus temozolamide alone for the treatment of glioblastoma. Methods MEDLINE (subset PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, Google scholar, and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for publications comparing TTF in combination with temozolomide versus temozolomide alone for the treatment of glioblastoma. The adverse outcomes were considered as the endpoints in this analysis. The statistical analysis was carried out by the latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4). Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data following assessment. A random effect model was used during the statistical analysis. Results A total number of 994 participants were included in this analysis whereby 572 participants were assigned to TTF + temozolomide, whereas 422 participants were assigned to temozolomide alone. All the studies were randomized trials. The majority of the participants were males (68.0–75.0%) with a mean age of the varying from 54.0 to 69.0 years. Results of this analysis showed that TTF in combination with temozolomide was not associated with significantly higher adverse outcomes related to blood and lymphatic system disorders (RR:0.87, 95% CI 0.30–2.48; P = 0.79), gastrointestinal disorders (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.14–4.72; P = 0.83), general deterioration and malaise (RR: 1.43, 95% CI 0.90–2.25; P = 0.13), infections and infestations (RR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.33–4.45; P = 0.78), injury/poison and procedural complications (RR: 1.78, 95% CI 0.88–3.61; P = 0.11), metabolic and nutritional disorders (RR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.34–1.08; P = 0.09), central nervous system disorders (RR: 1.14, 95% CI 0.89–1.46; P = 0.31), musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (RR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.48–2.07; P = 0.99), respiratory/thoracic/mediastinal disorders (RR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.44–1.62; P = 0.62), and psychiatric disorders (RR: 1.27, 95% CI 0.42–3.79; P = 0.67). Similar adverse effects were observed. Conclusion TTF in combination with temozolomide was not associated with significantly worse adverse outcomes for the treatment of patients with glioblastoma. Hence, future trials should focus on the cost-effectiveness of TTF for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery : the official publication of the Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons/Egyptian journal of neurosurgery
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-025-00342-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associated adverse outcomes with tumor treating fields when combined to temozolomide versus temozolomide alone for the treatment of glioblastoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Dayong Lou, Yuanyuan Chen, Yan Chen, Zhen Hong
1 citations
The Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery : the official publication of the Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons/Egyptian journal of neurosurgery
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.63
article

Associated adverse outcomes with tumor treating fields when combined to temozolomide versus temozolomide alone for the treatment of glioblastoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Dayong Lou, Yuanyuan Chen, Yan Chen, Zhen Hong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Glioma is a brain tumor and glioblastoma represents its most common type, accounting for almost 40% of primary tumors of the central nervous system, and is associated with the worst prognosis. Glioblastoma remains one of the major challenges in neurooncology. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved tumor treating fields (TTF) for the treatment of glioblastoma. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically assess the adverse outcomes associated with TTF when combined to temozolamide versus temozolamide alone for the treatment of glioblastoma. Methods MEDLINE (subset PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, Google scholar, and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for publications comparing TTF in combination with temozolomide versus temozolomide alone for the treatment of glioblastoma. The adverse outcomes were considered as the endpoints in this analysis. The statistical analysis was carried out by the latest version of the RevMan software (version 5.4). Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data following assessment. A random effect model was used during the statistical analysis. Results A total number of 994 participants were included in this analysis whereby 572 participants were assigned to TTF + temozolomide, whereas 422 participants were assigned to temozolomide alone. All the studies were randomized trials. The majority of the participants were males (68.0–75.0%) with a mean age of the varying from 54.0 to 69.0 years. Results of this analysis showed that TTF in combination with temozolomide was not associated with significantly higher adverse outcomes related to blood and lymphatic system disorders (RR:0.87, 95% CI 0.30–2.48; P = 0.79), gastrointestinal disorders (RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.14–4.72; P = 0.83), general deterioration and malaise (RR: 1.43, 95% CI 0.90–2.25; P = 0.13), infections and infestations (RR: 1.21, 95% CI 0.33–4.45; P = 0.78), injury/poison and procedural complications (RR: 1.78, 95% CI 0.88–3.61; P = 0.11), metabolic and nutritional disorders (RR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.34–1.08; P = 0.09), central nervous system disorders (RR: 1.14, 95% CI 0.89–1.46; P = 0.31), musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (RR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.48–2.07; P = 0.99), respiratory/thoracic/mediastinal disorders (RR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.44–1.62; P = 0.62), and psychiatric disorders (RR: 1.27, 95% CI 0.42–3.79; P = 0.67). Similar adverse effects were observed. Conclusion TTF in combination with temozolomide was not associated with significantly worse adverse outcomes for the treatment of patients with glioblastoma. Hence, future trials should focus on the cost-effectiveness of TTF for the treatment of glioblastoma.

The Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery : the official publication of the Egyptian Society of Neurological Surgeons/Egyptian journal of neurosurgeryVol. 40(1)
Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.