Measuring Early Maladaptive Schemas in Daily Life

Abstract Background The theoretical models of Beck and Young predict that Early Maladaptive Schemas (EMSs) are linked to the development and maintenance of mental health problems including depression. The stability of EMSs in daily life are ill-understood despite being a fundamental aspect of cognitive theories. In the current study, we aimed to improve the understanding of EMSs by repeatedly assessing them in daily life under changing contextual triggers and examining the theoretically-grounded associations with mood and rumination. Methods Using factor analysis, we developed a 16-item Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) version of the Dutch Young Schema Questionnaire short form (Klynstra et al., 2008). EMSs were assessed six times a day for five days in 90 unselected participants (71% female, M age = 25.52). Results The new EMA-based EMSs questionnaire captured EMSs fluctuations, with 51% of the variance attributed to within-person variations. We assessed the contemporaneous within-person associations between schema activation and negative affect and rumination as well as the impact of a triggering event on schema activation. Stronger EMSs activation was associated with more negative mood and rumination, as well as the occurrence of a recent triggering event. Conclusions The findings align with the cognitive models of Beck and Young extending them with daily life data. The results indicate that EMSs have both state and trait-like characteristics, and fluctuations in daily life can be assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-025-10574-5
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Early Maladaptive Schemas in Daily Life

Michèle Schmitter, Janna N. Vrijsen, Ger P. J. Keijsers, Indira Tendolkar et al.
5 citations
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Mental Health Research Topics
10.59
article

Measuring Early Maladaptive Schemas in Daily Life

Michèle Schmitter, Janna N. Vrijsen, Ger P. J. Keijsers, Indira Tendolkar, Jan Spijker, Robbert S. Baxendell
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The theoretical models of Beck and Young predict that Early Maladaptive Schemas (EMSs) are linked to the development and maintenance of mental health problems including depression. The stability of EMSs in daily life are ill-understood despite being a fundamental aspect of cognitive theories. In the current study, we aimed to improve the understanding of EMSs by repeatedly assessing them in daily life under changing contextual triggers and examining the theoretically-grounded associations with mood and rumination. Methods Using factor analysis, we developed a 16-item Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) version of the Dutch Young Schema Questionnaire short form (Klynstra et al., 2008). EMSs were assessed six times a day for five days in 90 unselected participants (71% female, M age = 25.52). Results The new EMA-based EMSs questionnaire captured EMSs fluctuations, with 51% of the variance attributed to within-person variations. We assessed the contemporaneous within-person associations between schema activation and negative affect and rumination as well as the impact of a triggering event on schema activation. Stronger EMSs activation was associated with more negative mood and rumination, as well as the occurrence of a recent triggering event. Conclusions The findings align with the cognitive models of Beck and Young extending them with daily life data. The results indicate that EMSs have both state and trait-like characteristics, and fluctuations in daily life can be assessed.

Cognitive Therapy and ResearchVol. 49(4)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Pro Persona (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mental Health Research Topics
10.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.