<scp>C2C—</scp> conflict to coexistence: A global approach to manage human–wildlife conflict for coexistence

Abstract Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) presents a growing challenge to conservation and development worldwide. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and experts on human–wildlife coexistence strategies have responded to this challenge by developing a holistic, globally applicable approach to HWC management that can be tailored to specific local, regional, or national contexts. Its framework addresses the complexity of essential HWC management and long‐term coexistence strategies and is implemented in a structured yet contextualized step‐by‐step sequence by a team of facilitators and multiple stakeholders. The C2C: Conflict to Coexistence Approach centers on four principles (tolerance is maintained, responsibility is shared, resilience is built, holism is fundamental), four outcomes (wildlife thrives alongside human presence, habitat sufficient to maintain viable wildlife populations, people able and willing to live alongside wildlife, livelihoods/assets secured against presence of wildlife), and six HWC management elements (policy and governance, understanding interactions, prevention, response, mitigation, monitoring) that are to be implemented in an integrated way. It is currently undergoing testing in diverse pilot sites across three continents and demonstrating positive initial results. Here, we share the framework and methodology of the approach and initial results and experiences from these pilot sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13292
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C2C— conflict to coexistence: A global approach to manage human–wildlife conflict for coexistence

Sybille Klenzendorf, Natalia Banasiak, Saloni Bhatia, Kate Vannelli et al.
5 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
8.58
article

C2C— conflict to coexistence: A global approach to manage human–wildlife conflict for coexistence

Sybille Klenzendorf, Natalia Banasiak, Saloni Bhatia, Kate Vannelli, Eva Groß, Silvio Marchini, Jennifer F. Moore, Wendy Elliott, Kayla A. Cranston, Drew McVey, Valeria Boron, Ruth Kansky, Jenny Anne Glikman, Margaret F. Kinnaird, Sanju Dahal, Diana Frances, Sandra Petrone, Kate Clemens, Nilanga Jayasinghe, Sither Tenzin, Elke van Gils, Femke Hilderink‐Koopmans
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) presents a growing challenge to conservation and development worldwide. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and experts on human–wildlife coexistence strategies have responded to this challenge by developing a holistic, globally applicable approach to HWC management that can be tailored to specific local, regional, or national contexts. Its framework addresses the complexity of essential HWC management and long‐term coexistence strategies and is implemented in a structured yet contextualized step‐by‐step sequence by a team of facilitators and multiple stakeholders. The C2C: Conflict to Coexistence Approach centers on four principles (tolerance is maintained, responsibility is shared, resilience is built, holism is fundamental), four outcomes (wildlife thrives alongside human presence, habitat sufficient to maintain viable wildlife populations, people able and willing to live alongside wildlife, livelihoods/assets secured against presence of wildlife), and six HWC management elements (policy and governance, understanding interactions, prevention, response, mitigation, monitoring) that are to be implemented in an integrated way. It is currently undergoing testing in diverse pilot sites across three continents and demonstrating positive initial results. Here, we share the framework and methodology of the approach and initial results and experiences from these pilot sites.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 7(2)
Antioch University New England (US), Stellenbosch University (ZA), University of Oxford (GB), World Wildlife Fund (US), Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (IN), Documentation Center of Cambodia (KH), WWF-UK (GB), WWF Germany (DE), Gerresheimer (Germany) (DE), Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (ES), Pension Fund for Care and Well-Being (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
8.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.