Expert perceptions on CPEC sustainability appraisal: SWOT analysis for informed policy decisions

Globally, the pursuit of sustainable development (SD) is of key importance. Sustainability assessments of large-scale infrastructure development projects play a critical role in balancing economic growth with social, environmental, and climate responsibilities. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a key initiative for regional and global economic advancement. It can also serve as a case study for sustainable development practices. This paper presents results from a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to explore the sustainability of the CPEC plan 2017–2030. A mixed method approach of SWOT Analysis integrated with multicriteria decision-making methods, including the Best Worst Method- mV Model (a linear programming method) has been applied to analyze, weight, and rank SWOT criteria. A survey of experts was conducted to scale assessment criteria related to CPEC sustainability. Results highlight that with regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position is the highest scoring criterion, and with regards to “internal weakness criteria”, increased dependency on China is the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position was identified as the highest scoring criterion and cultural friendliness as the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal weakness criteria”, technological inefficiencies were identified as the best, and increased dependency on China as the worst scoring criteria. In the context of “external opportunity’s criteria”, increased job opportunities and regional connectivity were the highest scoring criteria, and mutual trade gain was the lowest scoring criterion. Finally, for “external threats criteria”, natural resource exploitation was identified as the best scoring criterion. The results highlight the need to diversify partnerships within the Belt and Road Initiative in order to enhance environmental friendliness, and climate resilience, as well as to reducedependency risks, and foster equitable development. SWOT Analysis of CPEC Sustainability Appraisal • SWOT analysis evaluates CPEC's sustainability with MCDM and Best Worst Method. • Geostrategic position identified as top strength; dependency on China as main weakness. • Key opportunities include job creation; significant threat is natural resource exploitation. • Emphasized diversification in BRI partnerships for resilience and equitable growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Strategic Planning and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert perceptions on CPEC sustainability appraisal: SWOT analysis for informed policy decisions

Thomas B. Fischer, Muhammad Irfan Khan, Abdul Waheed, Sajida Kousar
2 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Strategic Planning and Analysis
4.45
article

Expert perceptions on CPEC sustainability appraisal: SWOT analysis for informed policy decisions

Thomas B. Fischer, Muhammad Irfan Khan, Abdul Waheed, Sajida Kousar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Globally, the pursuit of sustainable development (SD) is of key importance. Sustainability assessments of large-scale infrastructure development projects play a critical role in balancing economic growth with social, environmental, and climate responsibilities. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a key initiative for regional and global economic advancement. It can also serve as a case study for sustainable development practices. This paper presents results from a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to explore the sustainability of the CPEC plan 2017–2030. A mixed method approach of SWOT Analysis integrated with multicriteria decision-making methods, including the Best Worst Method- mV Model (a linear programming method) has been applied to analyze, weight, and rank SWOT criteria. A survey of experts was conducted to scale assessment criteria related to CPEC sustainability. Results highlight that with regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position is the highest scoring criterion, and with regards to “internal weakness criteria”, increased dependency on China is the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position was identified as the highest scoring criterion and cultural friendliness as the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal weakness criteria”, technological inefficiencies were identified as the best, and increased dependency on China as the worst scoring criteria. In the context of “external opportunity’s criteria”, increased job opportunities and regional connectivity were the highest scoring criteria, and mutual trade gain was the lowest scoring criterion. Finally, for “external threats criteria”, natural resource exploitation was identified as the best scoring criterion. The results highlight the need to diversify partnerships within the Belt and Road Initiative in order to enhance environmental friendliness, and climate resilience, as well as to reducedependency risks, and foster equitable development. SWOT Analysis of CPEC Sustainability Appraisal • SWOT analysis evaluates CPEC's sustainability with MCDM and Best Worst Method. • Geostrategic position identified as top strength; dependency on China as main weakness. • Key opportunities include job creation; significant threat is natural resource exploitation. • Emphasized diversification in BRI partnerships for resilience and equitable growth.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 164
International Islamic University, Islamabad (PK), University of Liverpool (GB), COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), North-West University (ZA)
Commonwealth Scholarship Commission
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Strategic Planning and Analysis
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.