Discussion on Assessing Predictability of Environmental Time Series With Statistical and Machine Learning Models

ABSTRACT Building on the insights from Bonas et al. (2024), we explore the relationship between statistical and machine learning models in the analysis of environmental time series. We specifically address the unique challenges of environmental time series data, including the need to consider the multivariate approach and account for spatial dependence. Emphasizing the importance of various types of statistical inference in environmental studies—not limited to forecasting—we propose that viewing statistical and machine learning approaches as complementary rather than alternative methods can unlock innovative modeling strategies that enhance both predictive accuracy and interpretive power. To illustrate these concepts, we present a case study that highlights the key points raised in the discussion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmetrics
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2900
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discussion on Assessing Predictability of Environmental Time Series With Statistical and Machine Learning Models

Francesco Finazzi, Lorenzo Tedesco, Jacopo Rodeschini
Environmetrics
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Discussion on Assessing Predictability of Environmental Time Series With Statistical and Machine Learning Models

Francesco Finazzi, Lorenzo Tedesco, Jacopo Rodeschini
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Building on the insights from Bonas et al. (2024), we explore the relationship between statistical and machine learning models in the analysis of environmental time series. We specifically address the unique challenges of environmental time series data, including the need to consider the multivariate approach and account for spatial dependence. Emphasizing the importance of various types of statistical inference in environmental studies—not limited to forecasting—we propose that viewing statistical and machine learning approaches as complementary rather than alternative methods can unlock innovative modeling strategies that enhance both predictive accuracy and interpretive power. To illustrate these concepts, we present a case study that highlights the key points raised in the discussion.

EnvironmetricsVol. 36(2)
University of Bergamo (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.