Contemporary review of prognostic markers of prostate cancer from a pathologist perspective

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignant tumour in men worldwide. To treat this condition, prognostic markers to distinguish indolent from aggressive disease, and biomarkers for metastatic forms are needed. From a pathologist's perspective, despite the plethora of emerging biomarkers, none to date has made its way into clinical practice. The need for prognostic and predictive markers following histological evaluation remains. This overview of some putative immunohistochemical and genetic markers reveals the pitfalls of biomarker research, notably verifiability, validity and interlaboratory comparison. Meta-analyses and extensive cooperation between pathology departments are a sine qua non. Codes of Best Practice such as the REMARK guidelines have been advocated as a path forward. Currently, the most widely used and validated prognostic marker remains the Gleason score. Ki67 along with PTEN are the most promising prognostic markers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Papers
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2025.003
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary review of prognostic markers of prostate cancer from a pathologist perspective

Jan Bouchal, Daniela Kurfürstová, Milan Král, Martin Eliáš
2 citations
Biomedical Papers
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
3.04
article

Contemporary review of prognostic markers of prostate cancer from a pathologist perspective

Jan Bouchal, Daniela Kurfürstová, Milan Král, Martin Eliáš
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignant tumour in men worldwide. To treat this condition, prognostic markers to distinguish indolent from aggressive disease, and biomarkers for metastatic forms are needed. From a pathologist's perspective, despite the plethora of emerging biomarkers, none to date has made its way into clinical practice. The need for prognostic and predictive markers following histological evaluation remains. This overview of some putative immunohistochemical and genetic markers reveals the pitfalls of biomarker research, notably verifiability, validity and interlaboratory comparison. Meta-analyses and extensive cooperation between pathology departments are a sine qua non. Codes of Best Practice such as the REMARK guidelines have been advocated as a path forward. Currently, the most widely used and validated prognostic marker remains the Gleason score. Ki67 along with PTEN are the most promising prognostic markers.

Biomedical PapersVol. 169(3)
University Hospital Olomouc (CZ), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contemporary review of prognostic markers of prostate cancer from a pathologist perspective — Jan Bouchal, Daniela Kurfürstová, et al. · Biomedical Papers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS