Eligibility for faricimab in a real-world diabetic macular oedema population: a cross-sectional study

Approximately 30% of DMO patients in the SMR met the main trial criteria from YOSEMITE and RHINE, while around 40% met the criteria based on treatment practice. The SMR and treatment practice cohorts were older and had less severe DMO than the trial cohorts. Further research into the safety profile of faricimab in clinical settings is necessary, along with the consideration of additional eligibility criteria when implementing faricimab in ophthalmology practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089801
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eligibility for faricimab in a real-world diabetic macular oedema population: a cross-sectional study

Inger Westborg, Helena Norberg, Asmaa Zakria Alnajjar
1 citations
BMJ Open
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
1.71
article

Eligibility for faricimab in a real-world diabetic macular oedema population: a cross-sectional study

Inger Westborg, Helena Norberg, Asmaa Zakria Alnajjar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Approximately 30% of DMO patients in the SMR met the main trial criteria from YOSEMITE and RHINE, while around 40% met the criteria based on treatment practice. The SMR and treatment practice cohorts were older and had less severe DMO than the trial cohorts. Further research into the safety profile of faricimab in clinical settings is necessary, along with the consideration of additional eligibility criteria when implementing faricimab in ophthalmology practice.

BMJ OpenVol. 15(2)
Umeå University (SE)
Umeå Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.