Repairing Cultural Ruptures in Psychotherapy: Strategies to Enhance the Therapeutic Alliance
Ruptures to the therapeutic alliance are an inevitable part of therapy. The ability to repair these ruptures is an essential therapist skill. Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences between therapists and patients can increase the likelihood of rupture to the therapeutic alliance, potentially leading to unilateral treatment termination by patients. Therapists therefore need skills to work effectively with patients who have diverse, intersectional identities. In this article, the authors give therapists tools to help protect against ruptures and to repair ruptures when they occur by integrating three complementary models: taking a stance of cultural humility to decrease assumptions, identifying and directly broaching cultural topics, and implementing a six-stage cultural repair model. A case example is used to illustrate these tools and techniques in practice. These skills can improve collaboration and decrease the inherent power imbalance in the therapeutic relationship.
Authors
- Aimee Murray (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-9674)
- Laurel D. Pellegrino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7917-6708)
- Seamus Bhatt-Mackin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5809-3914)
- David R. Topor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9070-7795)
- Ruby Barghini
- Alyson Nakamura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-4984)
- Anne E. Ruble
- Nicholas Boswell
Institutions
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
- Behavioral Pharma (United States) (US)
- Department of Veterans Affairs (AU)
- Temple University (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Journal of Psychotherapy
- Published
- 2025-02-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20240045
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.61