Inuit language(s)

This paper examines the relevant legislation which establishes the official languages of Nunavut, a multilingual subnational unit of Canada, and discusses issues in the interpretation of said legislation. The main issues identified are the definition of “Inuit Language” and the authority afforded to acts in “Inuit.” The Official Languages Act (2008) and the Inuit Language Protection Act (2008) establish and define the three official languages of Nunavut as English, French, and “Inuit Language.” I argue that the legislation, though recognizing Inuit cultural views of themselves as one people speaking one language, also accounts for the varying mutual intelligibilities between Inuit “dialects.” Importantly, there are provisions in the legislation which allow for the legislature to afford translations in the “Inuit Language” equal status to the English and French drafts. This is novel in a country predicated on equivalence and sameness of English and French and is deserving of further inquiry

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Working papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25071/2564-2855.43
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inuit language(s)

Griffin Cahill
Working papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Inuit language(s)

Griffin Cahill
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the relevant legislation which establishes the official languages of Nunavut, a multilingual subnational unit of Canada, and discusses issues in the interpretation of said legislation. The main issues identified are the definition of “Inuit Language” and the authority afforded to acts in “Inuit.” The Official Languages Act (2008) and the Inuit Language Protection Act (2008) establish and define the three official languages of Nunavut as English, French, and “Inuit Language.” I argue that the legislation, though recognizing Inuit cultural views of themselves as one people speaking one language, also accounts for the varying mutual intelligibilities between Inuit “dialects.” Importantly, there are provisions in the legislation which allow for the legislature to afford translations in the “Inuit Language” equal status to the English and French drafts. This is novel in a country predicated on equivalence and sameness of English and French and is deserving of further inquiry

Working papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at YorkVol. 4(SI)
York University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.