Exploring the burden of treatment in patients’ experiences of chronic condition management: A mixed-method study in Mendoza, Argentina

ObjectiveThis study investigated how patients managed their chronic diseases, focusing on burden of treatment, within the primary care level in Mendoza Province, Argentina.MethodThe study used a mixed-methods approach, including a qualitative component with a purposive sampling of patients with diabetes, hypertension, or depression using primary care services, and a quantitative component with secondary analysis of databases from public and social security. Ten focus group sessions were conducted at primary healthcare centers in urban and rural areas. The Burden of Treatment theory was used to frame the analysis.ResultsThe study found that accessing care was difficult due to appointment difficulties and long waiting times, and obtaining medication and laboratory tests at secondary centers was also problematic. Non-emergency hospital care required primary care referrals, and users in rural areas faced access problems. Financial constraints were significant, with co-payments in social security sector, transportation costs, and lost work revenue. Strategies employed included networking, emergency service use, careful planning, and taking loans.ConclusionThis study underscores the complex implications of chronic disease management in a subnational healthcare system and provides insights for policymakers and healthcare providers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chronic Illness
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17423953251318614
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the burden of treatment in patients’ experiences of chronic condition management: A mixed-method study in Mendoza, Argentina

Ezequiel García‐Elorrio, Natalí Ini, Andrea Falaschi, Juan Pedro Alonso et al.
3 citations
Chronic Illness
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
6.62
article

Exploring the burden of treatment in patients’ experiences of chronic condition management: A mixed-method study in Mendoza, Argentina

Ezequiel García‐Elorrio, Natalí Ini, Andrea Falaschi, Juan Pedro Alonso, Javier Eugenio Roberti, María Belizán, Agustina Mazzoni, Marina Guglielmino, Yanina Mazzaresi, Ana María Nadal, Gabriela Masier, Federico Baigorria, Juan Manuel Gómez-Portillo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study investigated how patients managed their chronic diseases, focusing on burden of treatment, within the primary care level in Mendoza Province, Argentina.MethodThe study used a mixed-methods approach, including a qualitative component with a purposive sampling of patients with diabetes, hypertension, or depression using primary care services, and a quantitative component with secondary analysis of databases from public and social security. Ten focus group sessions were conducted at primary healthcare centers in urban and rural areas. The Burden of Treatment theory was used to frame the analysis.ResultsThe study found that accessing care was difficult due to appointment difficulties and long waiting times, and obtaining medication and laboratory tests at secondary centers was also problematic. Non-emergency hospital care required primary care referrals, and users in rural areas faced access problems. Financial constraints were significant, with co-payments in social security sector, transportation costs, and lost work revenue. Strategies employed included networking, emergency service use, careful planning, and taking loans.ConclusionThis study underscores the complex implications of chronic disease management in a subnational healthcare system and provides insights for policymakers and healthcare providers.

Chronic IllnessVol. 21(3)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (AR)
Inter-American Development Bank, Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
6.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.