Compost amendments up to one inch restore dry rangeland soil health

Societal Impact Statement Rangelands harbor immense diversity and provide ecosystem services across vast swaths of land while supporting rural economies and the food system, but degraded rangelands may require active management to restore diversity and function. We added varying amounts of compost to understand if there are linear or saturating effects on vegetation and soil characteristics. We found linear effects on water movement and soil carbon, but little effect on vegetation community or abundance. Our results provide guidance for grassland managers to make cost–benefit analyses for using compost in their own situations. Summary Dry rangelands systems coproduce food and other ecosystem services, but degradation of productivity, diversity, and water holding capacity may require active intervention to restore function. Compost amendments on grasslands have improved vegetation, soil carbon, and water characteristics, but practitioners lack guidance of optimal use to meet their management goals. We compared surface‐dressed compost additions up to 2.5 cm at two ranches in New Mexico, USA, and measured plant composition and biomass, soil bulk density, hydraulic conductivity, aggregate stability, and total carbon content (0–10 cm depth) up to two years after addition. We used model selection to determine if response relationships with compost amount were supported, linear, or non‐linear. We found that 2.5 cm compost additions nearly doubled litter cover after two years. Soil carbon increased linearly with compost depth, with the 2.5 cm depth nearly doubling carbon content compared to control after two years. Hydraulic conductivity increased linearly with compost depth in the first year at one site. Other variables showed little response to compost. Overall, we did not identify strong saturating responses over this range of compost additions. Our results provide guidance for land stewards to assess their resources and management goals to optimize compost addition to build rangeland soil health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants People Planet
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10640
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compost amendments up to one inch restore dry rangeland soil health

Eva Stricker, Emily Cornell, Zach Withers
1 citations
Plants People Planet
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
1.72
article

Compost amendments up to one inch restore dry rangeland soil health

Eva Stricker, Emily Cornell, Zach Withers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Societal Impact Statement Rangelands harbor immense diversity and provide ecosystem services across vast swaths of land while supporting rural economies and the food system, but degraded rangelands may require active management to restore diversity and function. We added varying amounts of compost to understand if there are linear or saturating effects on vegetation and soil characteristics. We found linear effects on water movement and soil carbon, but little effect on vegetation community or abundance. Our results provide guidance for grassland managers to make cost–benefit analyses for using compost in their own situations. Summary Dry rangelands systems coproduce food and other ecosystem services, but degradation of productivity, diversity, and water holding capacity may require active intervention to restore function. Compost amendments on grasslands have improved vegetation, soil carbon, and water characteristics, but practitioners lack guidance of optimal use to meet their management goals. We compared surface‐dressed compost additions up to 2.5 cm at two ranches in New Mexico, USA, and measured plant composition and biomass, soil bulk density, hydraulic conductivity, aggregate stability, and total carbon content (0–10 cm depth) up to two years after addition. We used model selection to determine if response relationships with compost amount were supported, linear, or non‐linear. We found that 2.5 cm compost additions nearly doubled litter cover after two years. Soil carbon increased linearly with compost depth, with the 2.5 cm depth nearly doubling carbon content compared to control after two years. Hydraulic conductivity increased linearly with compost depth in the first year at one site. Other variables showed little response to compost. Overall, we did not identify strong saturating responses over this range of compost additions. Our results provide guidance for land stewards to assess their resources and management goals to optimize compost addition to build rangeland soil health.

Plants People PlanetVol. 7(5)
University of New Mexico (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Western SARE, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Rangeland and Wildlife Management
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.