Turbulent flushing of internal pipe-type surfaces in hydraulic components

The cleanliness of hydraulic systems has long been regarded as a crucial indicator of their performance and longevity. This study aims to elevate the cleanliness level of hydraulic components from 500 μm to 300 μm. To achieve this goal, this study integrates the flushing process and establishes a physical and mathematical model of wired solid pollutants on internal pipe-type surfaces during flushing based on Reynolds equation. This paper proposes the introduction of a cleanliness coefficient as a quantitative measure for evaluating cleanliness. The cleanliness coefficient serves as a threshold to determine whether particles can be effectively removed or not. The results of the orthogonal experiment demonstrate that the error between theoretical models and actual outcomes is merely 7.4%, affirming the effectiveness of the physical and mathematical models. The cleanliness coefficient provides guidance for setting flushing process parameters. The innovation of this study lies in the introduction of the cleanliness coefficient concept, which offers a more quantitative approach compared to traditional qualitative assessment methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241310315
Primary Topic
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turbulent flushing of internal pipe-type surfaces in hydraulic components

Sujie Lu, Zhisheng Zhang, Ming-Hsiang Song, Zhijie Xia
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
article

Turbulent flushing of internal pipe-type surfaces in hydraulic components

Sujie Lu, Zhisheng Zhang, Ming-Hsiang Song, Zhijie Xia
article en

Abstract

The cleanliness of hydraulic systems has long been regarded as a crucial indicator of their performance and longevity. This study aims to elevate the cleanliness level of hydraulic components from 500 μm to 300 μm. To achieve this goal, this study integrates the flushing process and establishes a physical and mathematical model of wired solid pollutants on internal pipe-type surfaces during flushing based on Reynolds equation. This paper proposes the introduction of a cleanliness coefficient as a quantitative measure for evaluating cleanliness. The cleanliness coefficient serves as a threshold to determine whether particles can be effectively removed or not. The results of the orthogonal experiment demonstrate that the error between theoretical models and actual outcomes is merely 7.4%, affirming the effectiveness of the physical and mathematical models. The cleanliness coefficient provides guidance for setting flushing process parameters. The innovation of this study lies in the introduction of the cleanliness coefficient concept, which offers a more quantitative approach compared to traditional qualitative assessment methods.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Turbulent flushing of internal pipe-type surfaces in hydraulic components — Sujie Lu, Zhisheng Zhang, et al. · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS