Effect of flipped classroom on student perceptions, academic scores and study practices

Aim. To evaluate the educational impact of two flipped classroom models. Material and methods. Traditional lectures were followed by Flipped classroom (FC) with face to face(F2F) session (cohort of 2019-20) and online (cohort 2020-21). Students’ perceptions were collected by questionnaire after lectures and FC. Historic academic scores on selected topic were compared scores after introduction of FC. The learning management system(LMS) was used to monitor student usage of learning resources. Results. Students perceptions for cohort 2019-20 were significantly higher(p>0.05) for FC(F2F) compared to lecture. Students’ perceptions for cohort 2020-21 were also significantly higher for FC(online) compared to online lecture. Academic scores did not show significant difference between lecture and FC. Increased hits on LMS for online resources were associated with FC or summative assessment. Conclusions. Students were overwhelmingly positive on FC for both: with F2F and online , and academic scores were similar to lecture. FC can possibly improve student study habits but needs further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Science
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20883/medical.e1120
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of flipped classroom on student perceptions, academic scores and study practices

Othman Wali, Shanthi Vanka, Amit Vanka
Journal of Medical Science
Innovative Teaching Methods
article

Effect of flipped classroom on student perceptions, academic scores and study practices

Othman Wali, Shanthi Vanka, Amit Vanka
article en

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the educational impact of two flipped classroom models. Material and methods. Traditional lectures were followed by Flipped classroom (FC) with face to face(F2F) session (cohort of 2019-20) and online (cohort 2020-21). Students’ perceptions were collected by questionnaire after lectures and FC. Historic academic scores on selected topic were compared scores after introduction of FC. The learning management system(LMS) was used to monitor student usage of learning resources. Results. Students perceptions for cohort 2019-20 were significantly higher(p>0.05) for FC(F2F) compared to lecture. Students’ perceptions for cohort 2020-21 were also significantly higher for FC(online) compared to online lecture. Academic scores did not show significant difference between lecture and FC. Increased hits on LMS for online resources were associated with FC or summative assessment. Conclusions. Students were overwhelmingly positive on FC for both: with F2F and online , and academic scores were similar to lecture. FC can possibly improve student study habits but needs further research.

Journal of Medical ScienceVol. 93(4)
Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Innovative Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.