Real Emotions for Unreal Fictional Objects: A Brentanean Perspective

Abstract The best-known arguments for the reality of emotions to fictional characters are (on their own) unable to show that appreciators of fiction have genuine emotional attitudes to fictional characters. At best, they point to the need to distinguish fictional emotions as states from fictional emotions as (relational) attitudes . I argue for this position by using an argumentative strategy that parallels one found in Brentano’s reist account of intentional states involving non-existent objects. The conception of emotional states that emerges yields a natural anti-realist conception of the intentional objects of such states and supports the view that we can have genuine emotions for unreal fictional objects. I contrast this view with Tim Crane’s and Mark Sainsbury’s well-known anti-realist views of intentionality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophia
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-024-00810-9
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real Emotions for Unreal Fictional Objects: A Brentanean Perspective

Frederick Kroon
2 citations
Philosophia
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
1.02
article

Real Emotions for Unreal Fictional Objects: A Brentanean Perspective

Frederick Kroon
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The best-known arguments for the reality of emotions to fictional characters are (on their own) unable to show that appreciators of fiction have genuine emotional attitudes to fictional characters. At best, they point to the need to distinguish fictional emotions as states from fictional emotions as (relational) attitudes . I argue for this position by using an argumentative strategy that parallels one found in Brentano’s reist account of intentional states involving non-existent objects. The conception of emotional states that emerges yields a natural anti-realist conception of the intentional objects of such states and supports the view that we can have genuine emotions for unreal fictional objects. I contrast this view with Tim Crane’s and Mark Sainsbury’s well-known anti-realist views of intentionality.

PhilosophiaVol. 52(5)
University of Auckland (NZ)
University of Auckland
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.