Are You Engaged With Bodily Signals?

Abstract: The conscious engagement with neutral and symptom-related bodily signals (i.e., interoceptive sensibility) is an important transdiagnostic factor whose assessment remains challenging. In two studies, we examined the psychometric properties and the validity of the German Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire (ISAQ) assessing two convenience samples ( N = 365 and N = 254), adults at risk for rosacea ( N = 376) and 44 outpatients with pathological illness anxiety compared to 40 controls. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated the structure of the German ISAQ is best represented by the 3‐factor model of the original version (F1: sensitivity to neutral bodily sensations, F2: attention to unpleasant bodily sensations, and F3: difficulty disengaging from unpleasant bodily sensations) with an acceptable model fit after consideration of modification indices. Reliability was acceptable for F1 and F2, but poor for F3. Higher correlations of F1 with measures of functional and of F2/F3 with measures of dysfunctional body focus indicated validity. Measurement invariance to the Dutch original was partially met. Persons with illness anxiety scored significantly higher in all ISAQ subscales. Comparable to the original, the German ISAQ is a valid instrument to assess neutral and negative body perception. The third subscale should be interpreted cautiously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000883
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are You Engaged With Bodily Signals?

Michael Witthöft, Marta Walentynowicz, A. Pohl, Carolin Wolters et al.
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Are You Engaged With Bodily Signals?

Michael Witthöft, Marta Walentynowicz, A. Pohl, Carolin Wolters, Tara M. Petzke, Severin Hennemann, Alexander L. Gerlach, Katleen Bogaerts
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The conscious engagement with neutral and symptom-related bodily signals (i.e., interoceptive sensibility) is an important transdiagnostic factor whose assessment remains challenging. In two studies, we examined the psychometric properties and the validity of the German Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire (ISAQ) assessing two convenience samples ( N = 365 and N = 254), adults at risk for rosacea ( N = 376) and 44 outpatients with pathological illness anxiety compared to 40 controls. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated the structure of the German ISAQ is best represented by the 3‐factor model of the original version (F1: sensitivity to neutral bodily sensations, F2: attention to unpleasant bodily sensations, and F3: difficulty disengaging from unpleasant bodily sensations) with an acceptable model fit after consideration of modification indices. Reliability was acceptable for F1 and F2, but poor for F3. Higher correlations of F1 with measures of functional and of F2/F3 with measures of dysfunctional body focus indicated validity. Measurement invariance to the Dutch original was partially met. Persons with illness anxiety scored significantly higher in all ISAQ subscales. Comparable to the original, the German ISAQ is a valid instrument to assess neutral and negative body perception. The third subscale should be interpreted cautiously.

European Journal of Psychological Assessment
University of Cologne (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Hasselt University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität zu Köln
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.