Benchmarking exercise and identification of AI tool to detect false information on food

Abstract The study has the objectives to conduct desk research to identify available AI‐based solutions for detecting false information and to benchmark the identified solutions against a set of features to take into account for an implementation at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The desk research identified 58 potential commercial platform candidates, 39 other but less applicable candidates and 8 related solutions from the intelligence sector. It further reviewed 5 EU tools, 19 EU funded projects, 17 academic projects and 3 other resources. Based on desk research, an initial benchmarking was performed using refined criteria, resulting in the identification of 10 top candidates for deeper analysis. These candidates were assessed through in‐depth research, including direct provider interactions. Questionnaires were sent to lower‐scoring platforms to further validate the desk research. A final benchmarking analysis, accompanied by a SWOT analysis, was produced for the top candidates. A framework for evaluation, incorporating various levels of actions, actors, tools, and knowledge, was developed and linked to a maturity model to assess the platforms’ suitability at different maturity levels. The study identifies solutions that are suitable for EFSA's current and future needs and could provide insights for other agencies and organizations with similar objectives on misinformation monitoring at scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Supporting Publications
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.en-9261
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking exercise and identification of AI tool to detect false information on food

Guy Coene, Evangelos Konstantinis
EFSA Supporting Publications
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Benchmarking exercise and identification of AI tool to detect false information on food

Guy Coene, Evangelos Konstantinis
article en

Abstract

Abstract The study has the objectives to conduct desk research to identify available AI‐based solutions for detecting false information and to benchmark the identified solutions against a set of features to take into account for an implementation at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The desk research identified 58 potential commercial platform candidates, 39 other but less applicable candidates and 8 related solutions from the intelligence sector. It further reviewed 5 EU tools, 19 EU funded projects, 17 academic projects and 3 other resources. Based on desk research, an initial benchmarking was performed using refined criteria, resulting in the identification of 10 top candidates for deeper analysis. These candidates were assessed through in‐depth research, including direct provider interactions. Questionnaires were sent to lower‐scoring platforms to further validate the desk research. A final benchmarking analysis, accompanied by a SWOT analysis, was produced for the top candidates. A framework for evaluation, incorporating various levels of actions, actors, tools, and knowledge, was developed and linked to a maturity model to assess the platforms’ suitability at different maturity levels. The study identifies solutions that are suitable for EFSA's current and future needs and could provide insights for other agencies and organizations with similar objectives on misinformation monitoring at scale.

EFSA Supporting PublicationsVol. 22(2)
Statistics Belgium (BE), Datamed Systems Integration (Greece) (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.