Protecting Vulnerable Populations: Informed Consent, Indigenous Gatekeepers of Deities, and Ethical Research Practices

The history of human subjects' research is fraught with instances of exploitation, particularly of vulnerable populations, under the guise of scientific progress. Notably, the Nazi experiments on prisoners during World War II and the U.S. Public Health Service Study of untreated syphilis in African American men in Macon County, Alabama (the Tuskegee syphilis study) stand out. These cases reflect a broader issue where vulnerable populations, unable to safeguard their interests, were exploited for others' benefit. Such abuses led to the establishment of ethical guidelines, codes of conduct, and regulations designed to protect human participants, especially those in vulnerable situations. Vulnerable populations in the course of research have hence been defined as communities or groups that face heightened risks of exploitation due to social, economic, environmental, or historical inequities. Among these are indigenous people who often bear the brunt of marginalisation. This work centres on Indigenous knowledge keepers, highlighting their resilience and invaluable contributions to preserving ancestral wisdom while addressing the unique challenges they face. This paper delves into the ethical principles guiding research, identifies vulnerable populations for research purposes, and instances where they can be breached. While other researchers have espoused issues on several groups of vulnerability, this researcher projects and focuses only on Indigenous gatekeepers of deities as vulnerable groups within Indigenous communities. They hold the responsibility of safeguarding spiritual practices, sacred knowledge, rituals, and sites associated with their deities or spiritual entities and whose cultural and spiritual properties can be appropriated or misused in research. The concept of informed consent is extended beyond individuals to encompass the protection of communities and their cultural heritage. , ensuring cultural integrity and safeguarding against exploitation in the research process. This research employs a qualitative approach, using a literature review, Laws and case studies to explore the ethical guidelines and historical instances of exploitation in human subjects’ research. It examines contemporary research ethics, with a focus on informed consent and the role of indigenous gatekeepers of deities, to propose ethical, legal frameworks that protect both individuals and communities, particularly in research involving indigenous populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Law Political Research and Administration
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52589/ajlpra-73s0zqy5
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protecting Vulnerable Populations: Informed Consent, Indigenous Gatekeepers of Deities, and Ethical Research Practices

Abimbola Oluwatoyin Adegbite
African Journal of Law Political Research and Administration
Ethics in medical practice
article

Protecting Vulnerable Populations: Informed Consent, Indigenous Gatekeepers of Deities, and Ethical Research Practices

Abimbola Oluwatoyin Adegbite
article en

Abstract

The history of human subjects' research is fraught with instances of exploitation, particularly of vulnerable populations, under the guise of scientific progress. Notably, the Nazi experiments on prisoners during World War II and the U.S. Public Health Service Study of untreated syphilis in African American men in Macon County, Alabama (the Tuskegee syphilis study) stand out. These cases reflect a broader issue where vulnerable populations, unable to safeguard their interests, were exploited for others' benefit. Such abuses led to the establishment of ethical guidelines, codes of conduct, and regulations designed to protect human participants, especially those in vulnerable situations. Vulnerable populations in the course of research have hence been defined as communities or groups that face heightened risks of exploitation due to social, economic, environmental, or historical inequities. Among these are indigenous people who often bear the brunt of marginalisation. This work centres on Indigenous knowledge keepers, highlighting their resilience and invaluable contributions to preserving ancestral wisdom while addressing the unique challenges they face. This paper delves into the ethical principles guiding research, identifies vulnerable populations for research purposes, and instances where they can be breached. While other researchers have espoused issues on several groups of vulnerability, this researcher projects and focuses only on Indigenous gatekeepers of deities as vulnerable groups within Indigenous communities. They hold the responsibility of safeguarding spiritual practices, sacred knowledge, rituals, and sites associated with their deities or spiritual entities and whose cultural and spiritual properties can be appropriated or misused in research. The concept of informed consent is extended beyond individuals to encompass the protection of communities and their cultural heritage. , ensuring cultural integrity and safeguarding against exploitation in the research process. This research employs a qualitative approach, using a literature review, Laws and case studies to explore the ethical guidelines and historical instances of exploitation in human subjects’ research. It examines contemporary research ethics, with a focus on informed consent and the role of indigenous gatekeepers of deities, to propose ethical, legal frameworks that protect both individuals and communities, particularly in research involving indigenous populations.

African Journal of Law Political Research and AdministrationVol. 7(4)
Lead City University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.