Socio-ecological conflict in Quilombola territory: land titling and ecosystem health

Ecosystem-based solutions are key to mitigating climate change and preserving a perpetually inhabitable planet under which humans, non-human animals, and the ecosystems they share can thrive. Central to ecosystem preservation are land tenure systems, which determine who has access to ecosystem resources and how this access is governed, and are often hotly contested. The growing recognition that land is valued, used, and protected differently by different agents has fueled a recent increase in large-scale analyses of land tenure systems and their effects on deforestation and other forms of ecosystem change. However, these effects are highly context dependent, and complementary research conducted at the community level has lagged behind its landscape- or national-level counterparts. Using ethnographic, qualitative, and quantitative methods, we collaborated with the Quilombola complex of Mata Cavalo in the midwest of Brazil to examine how their struggle for territorial recognition undermines the health of the Pantanal and Cerrado biomes with which they coexist. Our findings indicate that internal threats to the territory arise from exploitative labor practices and institutional racism, while the advancing frontier of extractive industries—agribusinesses, cattle ranches, and gold mines—poses a constant external threat. Together, these internal and external threats are undermining Quilombola rights and resistance in the territory of Mata Cavalo and accelerating ecological destruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01632-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-ecological conflict in Quilombola territory: land titling and ecosystem health

Gabriella Rennisy de Sousa Silva, Suelane Medeiros Moura, Tábata Berg, Enrique Cáceres Nieto et al.
3 citations
Sustainability Science
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
14.50
article

Socio-ecological conflict in Quilombola territory: land titling and ecosystem health

Gabriella Rennisy de Sousa Silva, Suelane Medeiros Moura, Tábata Berg, Enrique Cáceres Nieto, Julianne Meisner, Matheus Henrique Gonçalves de Souza, Zulmira Maria Lucio
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Ecosystem-based solutions are key to mitigating climate change and preserving a perpetually inhabitable planet under which humans, non-human animals, and the ecosystems they share can thrive. Central to ecosystem preservation are land tenure systems, which determine who has access to ecosystem resources and how this access is governed, and are often hotly contested. The growing recognition that land is valued, used, and protected differently by different agents has fueled a recent increase in large-scale analyses of land tenure systems and their effects on deforestation and other forms of ecosystem change. However, these effects are highly context dependent, and complementary research conducted at the community level has lagged behind its landscape- or national-level counterparts. Using ethnographic, qualitative, and quantitative methods, we collaborated with the Quilombola complex of Mata Cavalo in the midwest of Brazil to examine how their struggle for territorial recognition undermines the health of the Pantanal and Cerrado biomes with which they coexist. Our findings indicate that internal threats to the territory arise from exploitative labor practices and institutional racism, while the advancing frontier of extractive industries—agribusinesses, cattle ranches, and gold mines—poses a constant external threat. Together, these internal and external threats are undermining Quilombola rights and resistance in the territory of Mata Cavalo and accelerating ecological destruction.

Sustainability ScienceVol. 20(3)
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR), Universidade de Brasília (BR), University of Washington (US), Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
14.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.