Performance of Three Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Performance results of all CGM systems varied depending on the comparator method. However, across comparators FL3 and DG7 tended to be more accurate compared with MSP. All CGM systems showed a lower accuracy compared with previous studies, emphasizing the need for comprehensive study design guidelines.
Authors
- Manuel Eichenlaub (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2150-3160)
- Delia Waldenmaier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3280-2369)
- Stefan Pleus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-7754)
- Stephanie Wehrstedt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4586-4660)
- R. Schneider
- Derek Brandt
- Şükrü Öter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-1313)
- Manuela Link
- Guido Freckmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0406-9529)
- Nina Jendrike
- Cornelia Haug
- Vincent Braunack-Mayer
- Maren Schinz
Institutions
- Universität Ulm (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
- Published
- 2025-02-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968251315459
- Citations
- 41
- Primary Topic
- Diabetes Management and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 53.09