Comparison of Methods for Determining the Oil Content in Medium-Mature Shale—A Case Study from the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Dongying Depression

The oil content of shale oil reservoirs is a key parameter for reserve evaluation and “sweet spot” selection. However, discrepancies in the oil contents obtained by different methods have led to considerable disparities in the selection of exploration well locations and development strategies for shale oil. This study focuses on low to moderately mature sealed coring samples from the Dongying Depression in the Bohai Bay Basin. Three methods—NMR, Dean–Stark, and Rock-Eval—were employed to measure the oil content of shale. The results indicate that the oil content obtained by NMR is the highest, followed by the Dean–Stark distillation extraction method, while the pyrolysis method yields the lowest value. The study found that (1) the efficiency of the solvent extraction effect on moderately to low-mature shale is low since the occurrence of numerous closed pores leads to a lower yield when using the Dean–Stark method. (2) The exposure of shale samples to the air, sample crushing, and lag time for temperature increase cause a significant loss of light hydrocarbon components, resulting in the lowest oil content when measured by the Rock-Eval method. The NMR method, with its advantages of a short analysis time and non-destructive nature, appears to be the most advantageous method for shale oil content evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030708
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Methods for Determining the Oil Content in Medium-Mature Shale—A Case Study from the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Dongying Depression

Min Wang, Xinbin Zhao, Junliang Li, Shun Zhang et al.
2 citations
Energies
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.73
article

Comparison of Methods for Determining the Oil Content in Medium-Mature Shale—A Case Study from the Fourth Member of the Shahejie Formation in the Dongying Depression

Min Wang, Xinbin Zhao, Junliang Li, Shun Zhang, Min Tian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The oil content of shale oil reservoirs is a key parameter for reserve evaluation and “sweet spot” selection. However, discrepancies in the oil contents obtained by different methods have led to considerable disparities in the selection of exploration well locations and development strategies for shale oil. This study focuses on low to moderately mature sealed coring samples from the Dongying Depression in the Bohai Bay Basin. Three methods—NMR, Dean–Stark, and Rock-Eval—were employed to measure the oil content of shale. The results indicate that the oil content obtained by NMR is the highest, followed by the Dean–Stark distillation extraction method, while the pyrolysis method yields the lowest value. The study found that (1) the efficiency of the solvent extraction effect on moderately to low-mature shale is low since the occurrence of numerous closed pores leads to a lower yield when using the Dean–Stark method. (2) The exposure of shale samples to the air, sample crushing, and lag time for temperature increase cause a significant loss of light hydrocarbon components, resulting in the lowest oil content when measured by the Rock-Eval method. The NMR method, with its advantages of a short analysis time and non-destructive nature, appears to be the most advantageous method for shale oil content evaluation.

EnergiesVol. 18(3)
Sinopec (China) (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (CN), China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
National Science and Technology Major Project
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.