Error fields: personalized robotic movement training that augments one’s more likely mistakes

Control of movement is learned and uses error feedback during practice to predict actions for the next movement. We previously showed that augmenting error can enhance learning, but while such findings are encouraging, the methods need to be refined to accommodate a person's individual reactions to error. The current study evaluates error fields (EF) method, where the interactive robot tempers its augmentation when the error is less likely. 22 healthy participants were asked to learn moving with a visual transformation, and we enhanced the training with error fields. We found that training with error fields led to greatest reduction in error. EF training reduced error 264% more than controls who practiced without error fields, but subjects learned more slowly than our previous error magnification technique. These robotic training enhancements should be further explored in combination to optimally leverage error statistics to teach people how to move better. This study reports results from a clinical trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with ID: NCT02720341.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87331-x
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Error fields: personalized robotic movement training that augments one’s more likely mistakes

James L. Patton, Moria Fisher Bittmann, Naveed Reza Aghamohammadi, Robert Riener et al.
9 citations
Scientific Reports
Motor Control and Adaptation
12.88
article

Error fields: personalized robotic movement training that augments one’s more likely mistakes

James L. Patton, Moria Fisher Bittmann, Naveed Reza Aghamohammadi, Robert Riener, Verena Klamroth-Marganska, Felix C. Huang
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Control of movement is learned and uses error feedback during practice to predict actions for the next movement. We previously showed that augmenting error can enhance learning, but while such findings are encouraging, the methods need to be refined to accommodate a person's individual reactions to error. The current study evaluates error fields (EF) method, where the interactive robot tempers its augmentation when the error is less likely. 22 healthy participants were asked to learn moving with a visual transformation, and we enhanced the training with error fields. We found that training with error fields led to greatest reduction in error. EF training reduced error 264% more than controls who practiced without error fields, but subjects learned more slowly than our previous error magnification technique. These robotic training enhancements should be further explored in combination to optimally leverage error statistics to teach people how to move better. This study reports results from a clinical trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with ID: NCT02720341.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Tufts University (US), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US), University of Zurich (CH), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
National Centre of Competence in Research Robotics, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Motor Control and Adaptation
12.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Error fields: personalized robotic movement training that augments one’s more likely mistakes — James L. Patton, Moria Fisher Bittmann, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS