Potential for Augmenting Water Yield by Restoring Longleaf Pine (<i>Pinus palustris</i>) Forests in the Southeastern United States

Abstract Over 95% of original longleaf pine ( Pinus palustris ) (LLP) forests have been converted to other land uses, including loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L ) (LOP), croplands, urban uses during the past two centuries in the southeastern United States (U.S.) for socioeconomic developments. Restoring the LLP forests represents a contemporary forest management objective to improve wildlife habitat, water yield, and overall ecosystem services and resilience to a changing climate. Given the importance of understanding ecohydrological processes for guiding restoration efforts, this study compared evapotranspiration (ET) measurements at eight eddy covariance flux sites dominated by LLP or LOP forests in the southeastern U.S. In addition, we developed a “paired stands” approach to compare remote sensing based ET estimates and associated site biophysical properties for approximately 1,600 LLP‐LOP pairs. We found significant differences in ET, ET/Precipitation ratio, and water yield/precipitation ratio between the two types of pine forests, and these differences are explained by surface properties and management histories. Compared to LOP, the LLP forests generally had lower ET due to their significantly ( p &lt; 0.05) lower leaf area index but higher land surface temperature and albedo. Regionally, forest ET differences increased with the increase in atmospheric dryness index (reference ET/precipitation ratio). Therefore, we conclude that large‐scale restoration of LLP forests has the potential to reduce ET and augment water yield in the long run, especially in relatively drier watersheds. Maintaining low stand tree density and understory leaf area characteristic of natural LLP ecosystems through active forest management is critical for enhancing forest water supply. Our study provides the scientific basis for large scale restoration of a diminishing ecosystem for benefiting water resources in the southeastern U.S.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037444
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential for Augmenting Water Yield by Restoring Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris) Forests in the Southeastern United States

T. L. O’Halloran, A. Christopher Oishi, Maricar M. Aguilos, Devendra Man Amatya et al.
2 citations
Water Resources Research
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
article

Potential for Augmenting Water Yield by Restoring Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris) Forests in the Southeastern United States

T. L. O’Halloran, A. Christopher Oishi, Maricar M. Aguilos, Devendra Man Amatya, Carl Trettin, Gregory Starr, Ning Liu, Yun Yang, Yulong Zhang, Ge Sun
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Over 95% of original longleaf pine ( Pinus palustris ) (LLP) forests have been converted to other land uses, including loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L ) (LOP), croplands, urban uses during the past two centuries in the southeastern United States (U.S.) for socioeconomic developments. Restoring the LLP forests represents a contemporary forest management objective to improve wildlife habitat, water yield, and overall ecosystem services and resilience to a changing climate. Given the importance of understanding ecohydrological processes for guiding restoration efforts, this study compared evapotranspiration (ET) measurements at eight eddy covariance flux sites dominated by LLP or LOP forests in the southeastern U.S. In addition, we developed a “paired stands” approach to compare remote sensing based ET estimates and associated site biophysical properties for approximately 1,600 LLP‐LOP pairs. We found significant differences in ET, ET/Precipitation ratio, and water yield/precipitation ratio between the two types of pine forests, and these differences are explained by surface properties and management histories. Compared to LOP, the LLP forests generally had lower ET due to their significantly ( p &lt; 0.05) lower leaf area index but higher land surface temperature and albedo. Regionally, forest ET differences increased with the increase in atmospheric dryness index (reference ET/precipitation ratio). Therefore, we conclude that large‐scale restoration of LLP forests has the potential to reduce ET and augment water yield in the long run, especially in relatively drier watersheds. Maintaining low stand tree density and understory leaf area characteristic of natural LLP ecosystems through active forest management is critical for enhancing forest water supply. Our study provides the scientific basis for large scale restoration of a diminishing ecosystem for benefiting water resources in the southeastern U.S.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 61(2)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), North Carolina State University (US), Duke University (US), University of Alabama (US), Cornell University (US), Southern Research Station (US), Clemson University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, International Paper, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Nature Conservancy, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, U.S. Forest Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.