Return trade-offs between environmental and social pillars of ESG scores

Our analysis explores the trade-off between environmental and social factors, as we observe that the environmental and social performances of firms are negatively correlated across industries. We find that, from 2013 to 2022, firms with high environmental scores but low social scores outperformed those with low environmental scores but high social scores by an average of 0.39% per month. However, this outperformance diminished when the investment horizon began in 2016. We find that in the period following 2016, public markets began to signal an equal importance for both environmental and social pillars. Therefore, policy frameworks should aim to balance both environmental and social objectives to address the disparities created by regulations that favour one aspect of sustainability over the other.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research in International Business and Finance
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102779
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Return trade-offs between environmental and social pillars of ESG scores

Igor Lončarski, Helena Naffa, Gergely Czupy, Leyla Yusifzada
7 citations
Research in International Business and Finance
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
15.58
article

Return trade-offs between environmental and social pillars of ESG scores

Igor Lončarski, Helena Naffa, Gergely Czupy, Leyla Yusifzada
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Our analysis explores the trade-off between environmental and social factors, as we observe that the environmental and social performances of firms are negatively correlated across industries. We find that, from 2013 to 2022, firms with high environmental scores but low social scores outperformed those with low environmental scores but high social scores by an average of 0.39% per month. However, this outperformance diminished when the investment horizon began in 2016. We find that in the period following 2016, public markets began to signal an equal importance for both environmental and social pillars. Therefore, policy frameworks should aim to balance both environmental and social objectives to address the disparities created by regulations that favour one aspect of sustainability over the other.

Research in International Business and FinanceVol. 75
Strong, Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS, Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal, National Research, Development and Innovation Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
15.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.