How Karma Harms and Helps Generosity Toward Those in Need

Three preregistered cross-cultural studies (<i>N</i> = 6,049 across India, Singapore, and the United States) tested how belief in karma shapes victim blaming and helping. Study 1 found that belief in karmic causality positively predicts a variety of system-justifying beliefs that legitimate social inequalities, but experimental reminders of karma also encouraged generosity toward others experiencing financial hardship. Studies 2 and 3 tested whether karma framing had different effects on generosity toward different recipients, who varied in their level of need and reason for need. Thinking about karma changed the importance of recipient characteristics, with need being less predictive and external attributions more predictive of giving when thinking about karma. Overall, experimental reminders of karma only reliably increased generosity toward recipients whose financial need was no fault of their own, showing that karmic beliefs draw attention to the reasons for people's bad fortune, and evoke responses to misfortune that are sensitive to naturalistic explanations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251313829
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Karma Harms and Helps Generosity Toward Those in Need

Cindel White, Aiyana K. Willard
3 citations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
4.29
article

How Karma Harms and Helps Generosity Toward Those in Need

Cindel White, Aiyana K. Willard
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Three preregistered cross-cultural studies (<i>N</i> = 6,049 across India, Singapore, and the United States) tested how belief in karma shapes victim blaming and helping. Study 1 found that belief in karmic causality positively predicts a variety of system-justifying beliefs that legitimate social inequalities, but experimental reminders of karma also encouraged generosity toward others experiencing financial hardship. Studies 2 and 3 tested whether karma framing had different effects on generosity toward different recipients, who varied in their level of need and reason for need. Thinking about karma changed the importance of recipient characteristics, with need being less predictive and external attributions more predictive of giving when thinking about karma. Overall, experimental reminders of karma only reliably increased generosity toward recipients whose financial need was no fault of their own, showing that karmic beliefs draw attention to the reasons for people's bad fortune, and evoke responses to misfortune that are sensitive to naturalistic explanations.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
York University (CA), Brunel University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Karma Harms and Helps Generosity Toward Those in Need — Cindel White, Aiyana K. Willard · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS