Dynamics of strategy implementation across different types of new ventures

The nature of strategy and its implementation for entrepreneurs in emergent-stage ventures is explored. The emergent nature of these ventures finds them in an ongoing state of becoming as the entrepreneur interprets and makes sense of novel developments, with strategy formulation and implementation capabilities emerging in real time. Lacking resources, marketplace legitimacy, and critical capabilities, these entrepreneurs find the strategic direction of the firm is reliant on experimentation and ongoing learning through trial and error. It is important for entrepreneurs to realize that a bi-directional relationship exists between the formulation and implementation of strategy, where strategy is formed and modified in response to the realities introduced through execution efforts. We identify the fundamental differences in strategy formulation and implementation depending on whether the entrepreneur is creating a survival, lifestyle, managed growth, or aggressive growth business. These differences impact the need for and capacity of the firm to adapt and/or pivot as it evolves through stages of development. Key implementation priorities are provided for entrepreneurs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Dynamics
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101128
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamics of strategy implementation across different types of new ventures

Michael H. Morris, Donald F. Kuratko
2 citations
Organizational Dynamics
International Business and FDI
2.23
article

Dynamics of strategy implementation across different types of new ventures

Michael H. Morris, Donald F. Kuratko
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The nature of strategy and its implementation for entrepreneurs in emergent-stage ventures is explored. The emergent nature of these ventures finds them in an ongoing state of becoming as the entrepreneur interprets and makes sense of novel developments, with strategy formulation and implementation capabilities emerging in real time. Lacking resources, marketplace legitimacy, and critical capabilities, these entrepreneurs find the strategic direction of the firm is reliant on experimentation and ongoing learning through trial and error. It is important for entrepreneurs to realize that a bi-directional relationship exists between the formulation and implementation of strategy, where strategy is formed and modified in response to the realities introduced through execution efforts. We identify the fundamental differences in strategy formulation and implementation depending on whether the entrepreneur is creating a survival, lifestyle, managed growth, or aggressive growth business. These differences impact the need for and capacity of the firm to adapt and/or pivot as it evolves through stages of development. Key implementation priorities are provided for entrepreneurs.

Organizational DynamicsVol. 54(4)
University of Notre Dame (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
International Business and FDI
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamics of strategy implementation across different types of new ventures — Michael H. Morris, Donald F. Kuratko · Organizational Dynamics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS