Murray’s system of needs and the Big Five Personality Traits: Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to evaluate their relationship

Personality tests are used regularly as a requirement within many sectors in Brazil, including education, human resources, and transportation. The Personality Factor Inventory, based on Murray’s system of needs theory, is one of the widely used tools within Brazil. Despite its importance, its results are only partially related to the Big Five theory, which is the predominant framework for understanding personality. This theoretical divergence poses practical challenges for professionals who rely on or are required to work within the Big Five model. Harmonizing these two theories could enhance their practical utility. In this study, we evaluate the possibility of fitting Murray’s personality theory within the Big Five framework using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling and invariance tests (i.e., gender) using data from 272 845 participants in Brazil (56.2% men, M age 21.74 ± 15.24) who completed the Personality Factor Inventory. We also cross-validated the results with random samples. The results demonstrated an adequate fit, consistent reliability, and scalar/strong invariance. The percentage of Murray’s theory factor into the Big Five solution led us to conclude that Murray’s system of needs could fit into a five-factor solution reflecting the Big Five personality traits. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for future research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Persona
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26439/persona2024.n27(2).7384
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Murray’s system of needs and the Big Five Personality Traits: Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to evaluate their relationship

Christopher Murray, Ivan Rabelo, Louise Marques, Luís Anunciação et al.
Persona
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Murray’s system of needs and the Big Five Personality Traits: Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling to evaluate their relationship

Christopher Murray, Ivan Rabelo, Louise Marques, Luís Anunciação, Roberto Moraes Cruz, Anna Beatriz Gomes
article en

Abstract

Personality tests are used regularly as a requirement within many sectors in Brazil, including education, human resources, and transportation. The Personality Factor Inventory, based on Murray’s system of needs theory, is one of the widely used tools within Brazil. Despite its importance, its results are only partially related to the Big Five theory, which is the predominant framework for understanding personality. This theoretical divergence poses practical challenges for professionals who rely on or are required to work within the Big Five model. Harmonizing these two theories could enhance their practical utility. In this study, we evaluate the possibility of fitting Murray’s personality theory within the Big Five framework using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling and invariance tests (i.e., gender) using data from 272 845 participants in Brazil (56.2% men, M age 21.74 ± 15.24) who completed the Personality Factor Inventory. We also cross-validated the results with random samples. The results demonstrated an adequate fit, consistent reliability, and scalar/strong invariance. The percentage of Murray’s theory factor into the Big Five solution led us to conclude that Murray’s system of needs could fit into a five-factor solution reflecting the Big Five personality traits. The paper discusses the implications of these findings for future research and practice.

PersonaVol. 27(2)
Oregon Department of Human Services (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of Oregon (US), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.